User talk:Schmoozing

Knowledge Management

Hello - I removed the section you added because it is written like a discussion or essay. Wikipedia articles should be written authoratatively, citing verifiable facts, not asking questions or attempting to generating discussion. Discussion is best left to the article's talk page. Also, a link to a blog isn't generally considered a reliable source. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 15:33, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. there's one more guideline this falls under: original research --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 15:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your second message on my talk page [1], Wikipedia articles aren't the place for such things as original research, essays, or discussion. Discussion can take place on the article's talk page, but not in the article itself. Please review the following guidelines:

WP:OR (original research)
WP:NOT (what Wikipedia is not)

Thanks --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 17:25, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please read WP:OR - original research basically means thoughts, ideas, discussions, viewpoints, etc that are not already in some other verifiable source. Wikipedia articles cannot contain original research. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 18:12, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 16:37, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[2] Please note WP:3RR, you have now reverted the Knowledge Management article three times, any further reversions may result in a block for contravention of that rule.ALR 16:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]