User talk:Schmock

Welcome from Redwolf24

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (Redwolf24 10:40, 10 July 2005 (UTC)) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (Redwolf24) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.[reply]

Redwolf24 10:40, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I like messages :-P

Welcome

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 10:55, July 10, 2005 (UTC)

Maths

Hi. You seem to enjoy editing the Wikipedia articles on mathematics. So do I and a bunch of other people. Together we formed the so-called WikiProject Mathematics. Its associated talk page is a good place if you have a question related to maths on Wikipedia. Feel free to add yourself to the list of participants. Cheers, Jitse Niesen (talk) 00:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Fatou's lemma. The article is much improved now. Cheers. -- Timhoooey 01:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 15 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Schuette-Nesbitt formula, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--EncycloPetey 23:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rolle's Theorem

Hi Schmock. I've noticed a couple of problems with the examples in Rolle's theorem. I see that the examples were mostly your creation. I wonder if you would contribute to the discussion on the corresponding talk page. Thanks, reetep (talk) 11:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-analytic smooth function

Thank you for changes to this article, I agree that the new example is simpler and better. I modified the "The function is not analytic" section to make it consistent with the changes above it (so we talk only about f now, I removed the function g altogether). Perhaps you can take a further look at the article to see if I did got right. Thanks. You can reply here if you have comments. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 19:57, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grönwall's inequality

Are you watching the talk pages of pages you edit? I think you should. Please visit Talk:Grönwall's inequality and respond to the issues raised there. Hanche (talk) 15:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you actually provide some reference to the integral form with locally finite measures ? It seems that the reference for this form is missing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.185.96.91 (talk) 08:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A reference is now added. Schmock (talk) 09:45, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hahn decomposition theorem

Thanks for making the proof structure clear. This is definitely an improvement. Oded (talk) 04:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Extremal equality

Nice job you have done there. I see that you didn't find a better name for the section, or else you didn't bother to change it.

To be extremely consistent in the level of given details, you may add in the proof of case p = ∞ that you may assume ||f||_∞ > 0. Bdmy (talk) 11:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"In particular"

Please see this edit. The phrase "in particular" makes no sense. If a function G has a finite sup M and a finite inf m on an interval and does not attain them, then it is still true that m ≤ G(t) ≤ M on that interval, and it's easy to exhibit such examples. Whether the inf and sup are actually attained is a separate question. Michael Hardy (talk) 23:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The use of fields mr and zbl in the {{Citation}} template

Hello, Mr. Schmock, is it yours the splendid idea of introducing the fields mr and zbl in the {{Citation}} template? I praise it since increases very much the easiness of usability and the usefulness of the template itself. :D Daniele.tampieri (talk) 13:25, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe you're busy now, but I anyway want to award you this barnstar:

		The da Vinci Barnstar
		To you, Mr. Schmock, and your collaborators for the introduction of the fields mr, jfm and zbl in the {{Citation}} template. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 07:27, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for the barnstar. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 19:18, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again thank you!

Hi Uwe (can I call you so?), thank you very much for simplifying the proof of lemma 1 of the "Locally integrable function" entry: however, it seems to me that it is possible to simplify further the proof using lemma 1.2 (pp. 2–3) of Bahouri, Hajer; Chemin, Jean-Yves; Danchin, Raphael (2011), Fourier analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 343, Berlin – Heidelberg – New York: Springer Verlag, pp. xvi+523, ISBN 978-3-642-16829-1, MR 2768550, Zbl 1227.35004. Could you give it a look and tell me if it could be a viable option? An advantage of this approach is that we can quote a reliable source. Daniele.tampieri (talk) 19:18, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pages using MathJax

On wikipedia I don't know because I really don't know it's mathematics coverage.

On other sites, one I've seen which is firmly wedded to MathJax is ProofWiki, but don't take it too seriously because it really is seriously the shittiest website in the history of the universe. And it has egregious political power-squabbles which make Wikipedia look like a teddy-bear's tea party. --Matt Westwood 21:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doob decomposition theorem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Complex vector space (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cauchy product, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harmonic series (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

colon-equals in mathematics

Hi, I was just reading the page on the Optimal Stopping Theorem and it appears that you are the one who did much of the mathematics on that page, including the use of a := operator in several places. Is this intentional or a holdover from some programming language (I'm guessing Pascal)? I don't *think* it has a specific mathematical meaning but I could be mistaken. PsyMar (talk) 01:25, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Schmock. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Schmock. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Schmock. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]