User talk:Scatcat2009

Hi Scat

I would be interesting in corresponding about Lily Poulett-Harris - Rory rorygcunningham@aol.com

Roryharrow (talk) 20:06, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Copyright violations problems again

Hello, Scatcat2009. The word again is used in the heading because, seeing your big edits at the Fornication and Premarital sex‎ articles, I looked into your edit history to learn more about your editing style and found this discussion (it's one of your diff-links; the archived discussion might have more in it) about Wikipedia:Copyright violations. This was two years ago, and Jauerback and Someguy1221 were concerned about you making further copyright violations in Wikipedia articles. From what I see of your edits at the Fornication and Premarital sex‎ articles, it seems that you have made such violations again. I decided to wait with regard to approaching you about this matter, wanting to see if you would stop, perhaps do something different, or if someone else would notice and revert you, but since that didn't happen, I'm here now at your talk page. Per Wikipedia:Copyright violations, it's likely that a lot of what you added should be removed. Flyer22 (talk) 05:13, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Indefinite block for copyright problems

On June 6th, you added substantial content to Wikipedia from http://www.swarthmore.edu/Library/friends/sex.htm. For one example:

Source text

article text

Mary Calderone's 1973 lecture to Friends General Conference echoed themes similar to Mace.� Good riddance to the traditional moral standards which had been so destructive to a healthy sexuality.� Since "sexuality is an innate part of the human beings, then there surely be that of God in human sexuality."�� She claimed to be speaking as a "neutral scientist" in outlining the stages of human sexual development and the increasing redefinition of marriage.� "The marriage ceremony is increasingly looked upon as a literally moveable feast in the life span or a given relationship, to be elected or not elected according to the value of the relationship itself, rather than a pass conferred by society to mutual sex experiences . . . " [48]

Mary Calderone's 1973 lecture to Friends General Conference echoed themes similar to Mace. Good riddance to the traditional moral standards which had been so destructive to a healthy sexuality. Since "sexuality is an innate part of the human beings, then there surely be that of God in human sexuality."She claimed to be speaking as a "neutral scientist" in outlining the stages of human sexual development and the increasing redefinition of marriage. "The marriage ceremony is increasingly looked upon as a literally moveable feast in the life span or a given relationship, to be elected or not elected according to the value of the relationship itself, rather than a pass conferred by society to mutual sex experiences... "

Beyond what seems to be blatant copy-paste (content both inside and outside of quotation marks seems to be copied from your cited source), you are continuing to construct articles with non-free content in a manner inconsistent with WP:C and WP:NFC. You have been cautioned about copyright policies before.

Because of this, I feel it is necessary to block your account pending some indication that you understand our copyright policies and will comply. Please see Wikipedia:Copy-paste and the linked policies and guidelines. In terms of copyrighted sources, the bulk of content you place on Wikipedia must be written in your own words. You may use quotations to support your text, but not as a replacement for writing your own material. And content cannot be copied from external sources as with this one without verified license.

If you would like to continue contributing, please review those pages and clarify any confusion you may have about them prior to requesting unblock. Unfortunately, we really cannot afford to take chances with this important legal issue. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:06, 7 June 2014 (UTC)