User talk:Scandza
Headline text
[edit]
|
Philosophy of Anthropology
[edit]Philosophy of anthropogy refers to the philosophical discipline concerned with the issues of anthropology. As a branch of the social sciences, it is deeply related to sociology, ethnology and history. One of its main goals is to unify the several empirical investigations of human nature in an effort to understand individuals as both creatures of their environment and creators of their own values.[1]
Historical overview
[edit]
What fruitful new developments would not arise if only our whole philosophy would become anthropology. Johann Gottfried Herder[2]
Before the modern methods of research and fieldwork anthropology was regarded in the western world as a branch of philosophy. It took Immanuel Kant 25 years to write one of the first major treatises on anthropology, his Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Kant is not generally considered to be a modern anthropologist, however, as he never left his region of Germany nor did he study any cultures besides his own. Anthropology, as we know it today, is thus primarily a post-Enlightenment endeavour that encompasses other empirical areas of investigation. Modern philosophy of anthropology's main goal is not the creation of a theoretical framework with which we can explore deeper the empirical results of the social sciences, but the development a broader perspective intended to help tackle conceptual loopholes brought about by common assumptions. Philosophy of anthropology also tries to examine the problems in value theory that arise when anthopologists confront cultures that do not share their own society's standards.
Epistemology
[edit]Philosophy of anthropology is intimately related to the issues of epistemology as it tries to examine the way knowledge is acquired and shered. There are at least two major strands in the study of epistemology applied to anthropology. Cognitive anthropology, as described in the works of Lévi-Strauss and the structuralists that see cultures and societies as a rule-governed set of structures. It radically differs from social relativism as being...
Translation, interpretation and culture
[edit]The work of a major philosopher, WVO Quine has been the source of much research on the areas of translation, interpretation and semantics; which are important areas in the human sciences. There has been considerable controversy within anthropology concerning the methodological problems posed by the investigation of alien cultures. Semantics is related to such questions as 'is translation possible?', 'Can I judge the truth/falsity of the beliefs of members of an alien culture?', 'Is rationality only a "modern" phenomenon?'.[3]
Related areas
[edit]- Linguistic anthropology
- Linguistic relativism
Bibliography
[edit]- Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology
- Edward Craig - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Entry on 'Philosophy of antrhopology'
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Britannica - Philosophical Anthropology
- ^ John H. Zammito, Kant, Herder, and the birth of anthropology, (University of Chicago Press, 2002) p.XXII, ISBN 0226978591
- ^ Graham Macdonald, Philip Pettit, Semantics and social science, (Taylor & Francis, 1981), p.14 ISBN 0710007841
External links
[edit]Religious Market
[edit]Religious Market Structure, Religious Participation, and Outcomes
Global Internet Freedom Consortium
[edit]The Global Internel Freedom Consortium is a network of ... engineers... founded by ...
According to its official website, the froup's mission is "to build a pioneering online platform that breaks down the Great Firewalls blocking the free flow of information penetrating into, moving within, and originating from closed societies (e.g., China and Iran) via the Internet.
- Official website
- link title Newsweek - Strange Bedfellows, How the Falun Gong ended up
- US Newswire - Global Internet Freedom Consortium (GIFC) Offers China-Based Reporters Software to Break Through Internet Blockade
Page titles
[edit]
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Carlos Slim Helú a different title by copying its content and pasting it into Carlos Slim. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 19:10, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
William Blake
[edit]I just wanted to thank you for your contributions to Blake-related articles! Keep it up! Lithoderm 23:13, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- By the way, if you want to work on projects the best way to do it is by creating a subpage like this: User:Scandza/whatever. Lithoderm 18:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Re:White Hispanic
[edit]I understand your angry b/c I called you dumb, and I'm sorry for calling you that. I regret using that word, and I should have been more wiser not to use it. Even though I've called you dumb, that doesn't mean that you should attack me personally in my talk page.
Anyways, going back to the subject. The reference listed for Kenny Florian says he French, Armenian, Spanish, Italian, and German ancestry which makes him White. He doesn't list Amerindian ancestry. I don't know what more do you want since it seems you are the one who views him mestizo b/c of his skin color. The people Armenia and the Southern portions of Spain and Italy are mainly have darker skin tones than those in the Northern portion of Europe and Western Asia/Caucasus. Also, when you said that the source doesn't "prove" he is not mestizo, do you want a genetics test or something? You know not all White people are homogeneous, many have some amount of non-White genes. Even in the US, you have Whites w/ black or indigenous genes, and by going through genetics, how are we sure Ilan Stavans or any of the people pictured in White Hispanics has non-White genetics. Race is mainly self-identification, not genetics. Hopefully this has cleared up any animosity b/t us and cleared the confusion caused by this. Thank you for reading. Lehoiberri (talk) 21:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Do you happen to have any more information about Professor Erdman? I myself looked him up online but was unable to find any info about when and where he was born, or even whether he is still living. I ask mainly because the first sentence of the article states that he "was" but the article is classified under "living people". Let me know if you can do any better than I did at finding anything out- he seems to be a very private person. Lithoderm 20:59, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Amat Escalante, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.biosstars.us/a/amat_escalante.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:40, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Slovenia–Mexico relations
[edit]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Slovenia–Mexico relations. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slovenia–Mexico relations. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:23, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
An old friend returns
[edit]I believe that User:LatinoAussie is back at Latin American Australian (which he has just renamed to Latin Australian. I strongly suspect that the User:Plzppl is a sockpuppet of LatinoAussie/Cazique/TeePee etc - the name was created on the day the LatinoAussie account was closed, and show the same behaviour.
If you have time, could you please:
- lend your views to Talk:Latin Australian - remind Plzppl that this issue was discussed exhaustively last year.
- consider the evidence that Plzppl is a sockpuppet, and provide your views at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Plzppl
Thanks, Kransky (talk) 12:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Mexican of European descent
[edit]While not thrilled with your language in the comment box, I rechecked my sources on that article and decided that it did not support that there were more "whites" numerically in the Mexico City area, just that race distinctions were strongest because of the power structure. However, another source does state that "white" is associated with Spanish colonialism and historically they were concentrated in Mexico City. It might not be possible to know for certain if most "whites" are in the north or anywhere else since there is not formal census of race, even by self-identification. Thelmadatter (talk) 12:31, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
My belief and statement
[edit]I have learned for myself that your beliefs are not true. You have a gross misunderstanding of religion. If you think we're really threatening, you can kill us or have us arrested. We will not succumb to your false beliefs. 128.187.97.19 (talk) 20:19, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Scandza. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]Can you please add your sources to Susana Casillas? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 11:17, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Scandza. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Fearful Symmetry.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Fearful Symmetry.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
The article Murnau the Vampire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No independent evidence of notability (the one being from its own website), no sources providing substantive coverage. Fails the GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 18:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
The article The Seamus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable band
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 08:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Philosophy and Real Politics.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Philosophy and Real Politics.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
