User talk:Scalga/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Scalga. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
State Defense Forces
Let's not have another edit war. Please point me to the part of the DoD's 2005 report that says what SDFs are legal and which are not. Newguy34 (talk) 19:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Please show me in the DoD's report where it lists or doesn't list any "official" SDF. Not your original research or synthesis from 32 USC. It has to be in the reliable source, as we have discussed many times, or it is vandalism. Newguy34 (talk) 06:39, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- I am not affiliated with the Colorado group, and I have never met anyone that is. I am not a cop to decide whether they are legal or illegal; are legally wearing military uniforms or not. You have to play by Wiki's rules or don't contribute. The rule is that we go with what the reliable sources say, not our personal opinions or synthesis (please familiarize yourself by reading here). We have been through this about eleventy-billion times now. Also, please mind your civility. So, again, where in the DoD's report does it list Colorado or any of the others, for that matter? Newguy34 (talk) 06:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, slick, I have a military ID too (and mine's issued by the US government). Now, we may finally be getting somewhere with you. I am going to edit the article slightly to remove "Therefore, all SDF's are state agencies." That's forming a conclusion and that's not allowed. See, GSDF that wasn't hard, was it? No need to revert to using ANON IPs and accusing me of belonging to an illegal organization. I'll accept your apology for acting like an ass at any time. Newguy34 (talk) 07:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Or, I guess you aren't going to man up. Newguy34 (talk) 07:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, slick, I have a military ID too (and mine's issued by the US government). Now, we may finally be getting somewhere with you. I am going to edit the article slightly to remove "Therefore, all SDF's are state agencies." That's forming a conclusion and that's not allowed. See, GSDF that wasn't hard, was it? No need to revert to using ANON IPs and accusing me of belonging to an illegal organization. I'll accept your apology for acting like an ass at any time. Newguy34 (talk) 07:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- I am not affiliated with the Colorado group, and I have never met anyone that is. I am not a cop to decide whether they are legal or illegal; are legally wearing military uniforms or not. You have to play by Wiki's rules or don't contribute. The rule is that we go with what the reliable sources say, not our personal opinions or synthesis (please familiarize yourself by reading here). We have been through this about eleventy-billion times now. Also, please mind your civility. So, again, where in the DoD's report does it list Colorado or any of the others, for that matter? Newguy34 (talk) 06:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Still reverting edits
Why don't you go read the article first? I made all the changes to make you happy, and make your case stronger (i.e., I am helping you out) because I am generous and tolerant. Put the beer down SDF-boy and read the article before you start popping off with the edit-war. Newguy34 (talk) 07:22, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Do not vandalise my talk page by adding the same information multiple times, as you did yesterday. Newguy34 (talk) 21:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Look SGT, SPC, or whatever of the GSDF, you posted this "Obviously you are affiliated with this illegal Colorado militia that violates federal law by wearing the military uniform without authorization. Colorado disbanded its SDF. I have shown you that. Since CO has no SDF, you cannot include it. Billy Bob's Militia is not an SDF. SDF's are state regulated, not redneck-regulated." twice. Once at 06:42, 28 January 2009 and then, again, at 07:11, 28 January 2009 (see the history pages for evidence). The second time was not needed, and I consider that vandalism and/or stalking and provoking. Straighten up your act now. Your long history of problem editing on Wikipedia can't be hidden by having your pages courtesy blanked. We have come to a reasonable compromise on the SDF page despite your unwillingness to follow Wiki's policies until very late in the process. As such, we are done. Full stop. And, no response is needed, as my patience with you has run out. All the best, Newguy34 (talk) 03:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- My ass, you are a 1LT; you don't have that much class. Or do they just give those state commissions away in Georgia? Newguy34 (talk) 05:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- ROTC?! Ha, ha, ha! "Top six" senior military college?! Ha. ROLMFAO! Ok, whatever, "lieutenant". Thanks for the laugh. Newguy34 (talk) 05:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- My ass, you are a 1LT; you don't have that much class. Or do they just give those state commissions away in Georgia? Newguy34 (talk) 05:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Look SGT, SPC, or whatever of the GSDF, you posted this "Obviously you are affiliated with this illegal Colorado militia that violates federal law by wearing the military uniform without authorization. Colorado disbanded its SDF. I have shown you that. Since CO has no SDF, you cannot include it. Billy Bob's Militia is not an SDF. SDF's are state regulated, not redneck-regulated." twice. Once at 06:42, 28 January 2009 and then, again, at 07:11, 28 January 2009 (see the history pages for evidence). The second time was not needed, and I consider that vandalism and/or stalking and provoking. Straighten up your act now. Your long history of problem editing on Wikipedia can't be hidden by having your pages courtesy blanked. We have come to a reasonable compromise on the SDF page despite your unwillingness to follow Wiki's policies until very late in the process. As such, we are done. Full stop. And, no response is needed, as my patience with you has run out. All the best, Newguy34 (talk) 03:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
You have just proven yourself. There is no such thing as "Top six" SMC's. There are only six. Five Federal Academies and six Senior Military Colleges. I doubt you were even in the military, or at most you were a grunt who never amounted to anything. Then again, since at least one of us is, I can vouch that there are some morons, so I guess I take back that you probably weren't. They do have to go somewhere. Todd Gallagher (talk) 05:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- If there are only six then they are the "top six" idiot. Keep it coming, proud graduate of a senior military college who writes unintelligible run-on sentences. They don't actually give you guys guns in the GSDF, do they? That scares the shit out of me! Newguy34 (talk) 05:44, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- I am proud of your logic.Todd Gallagher (talk) 05:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- You should be, son. Stick around and I'll teach you a thing or two. So, tell me about the cool uniforms you wear so that you don't get confused with real soldiers. Too funny. I crack myself up. Newguy34 (talk) 05:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- I am proud of your logic.Todd Gallagher (talk) 05:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Scalga. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |