User talk:Scaledish/Archives/2021/May
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Scaledish. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Request for help
hello? is this a place to discuss things. Very new to Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hedgey wiki (talk • contribs) date (UTC)
- Hey @Hedgey wiki:, I suppose it depends on what you want to talk about! Feel free to ask here though! (you can add your name to posts by writing 4 tides) (Make sure to hit the reply button so I am notifed)Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 18:34, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- You have written a very nice article. But i really want to sort out this idea of dew point. It's not quite what you have described. And i do have publicaations to back this up. Might take me a while to find them! ;-) But they do exist. And actually its very simple point. It's just we are employing someone soon, and I want them to be able to find the right information on Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hedgey wiki (talk • contribs) date (UTC)
- @Hedgey wiki:, You seem to be under the misinterpretation that I am the primary author of Dew point, this is not the case. Is there a issue you are having with editing that you need help with? Regards, Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 20:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- You have written a very nice article. But i really want to sort out this idea of dew point. It's not quite what you have described. And i do have publicaations to back this up. Might take me a while to find them! ;-) But they do exist. And actually its very simple point. It's just we are employing someone soon, and I want them to be able to find the right information on Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hedgey wiki (talk • contribs) date (UTC)
Rollback granted
Hi Scaledish. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (talk) 10:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you Anarchyte, I shall wield this power with great responsibility.
- Regards,
Scaledish! Talkish? Statish.
13:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
You are now a pending changes reviewer!
Hi Scaledish! I've been running into you while patrolling logs and recent changes, and I happened to notice that you don't have the pending changes reviewer rights. I hope you don't mind, but I went through your contributions and I noticed that you're quite active in recent changes patrolling and that you consistently view and undo vandalism and bad faith disruption. I believe that the pending changes reviewer rights would be useful for you to have and that you'd make good use of the tools. Instead of having you formally request the rights at WP:PERM, I went ahead and just gave it to you. This user right allows you to review edits that are pending approval on pages currently under pending changes protection and either accept the edits to make them viewable by the general public, or decline and revert them.
Please keep these things in mind regarding the tool or when you're reviewing any pending changes:
- A list of articles with pending edits awaiting review can be viewed at Special:PendingChanges.
- A list of the articles currently under pending changes protection can be viewed at Special:StablePages.
- Being granted and having these rights does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you (obviously).
- You'll generally want to accept any pending changes that appear to be legitimate edits and are not blatant vandalism or disruption, and reject edits that are problematic or that you wouldn't accept yourself.
- Never accept any pending changes that contain obvious and clear vandalism, blatant neutral point of view issues, copyright violations, or BLP violations.
Useful guidelines and pages for you to read:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline and tutorial on using the rights and reviewing pending changes.
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, a summary of pending changes protection, the pending changes user right, and how it applies.
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy section on pending changes protection and its appropriate application and use by administrators.
I'm sure you'll do fine with the reviewer rights - it's a pretty straight-forward tool and it doesn't drastically change the interface that you're used to already. Nonetheless, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my user talk page if you run into any questions, get stuck anywhere, or if you're not sure if you should accept or revert pending changes to a page - I'll be more than be happy to help you. If you no longer want the pending changes reviewer rights, let me know and I'll be happy to remove it for you. Thank you for helping to patrol recent changes and keep Wikipedia free of disruption and vandalism - it's a very thankless job to perform and I want you to know that it doesn't go unnoticed and that I appreciate it very much. Happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:25, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you @Oshwah:, Truly means the world. To the future!
- Much, much thanks,
Scaledish! Talkish? Statish.
03:30, 22 May 2021 (UTC)- Scaledish - You bet. You deserve it. Keep up the great work, and thank you for giving your time and energy toward fighting vandalism. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:09, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Why revert? See Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion#To_convert. 81.2.252.231 (talk) 01:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- @81.2.252.231: Thank you. Due to the high volume of spam, it is often hard to distinguish spam from quality edits (Brief glance looked like random letters), however I was not horribly suspicious so I abstained from warning you. Thank you for bringing this issue up, I have reinstated your edit. I would also encourage you to create an account as accounts are less likely to be caught in the filter. Cheers!
Scaledish! Talkish? Statish.
02:20, 25 May 2021 (UTC)- Sorry for the misunderstanding, and thanks! 81.2.252.231 (talk) 02:32, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- God speed.
Scaledish! Talkish? Statish.
02:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- God speed.
- Sorry for the misunderstanding, and thanks! 81.2.252.231 (talk) 02:32, 25 May 2021 (UTC)