User talk:Sca/Archive05
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Sca. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Robert Koch may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- in the [[Franco-Prussian War]], and following his service, worked as a physician in Wollstein (now [[Wolsztyn|Wolsztyn, Poland]].<ref name="Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch"/> Koch’s marriage with
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:46, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Done. Sca (talk) 17:17, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Re: Henryk Sienkiewicz
I don't recall reading this in my sources, but it is plausible. To get into the gist of it, we would probably need to look at literature analyzing the novel itself, which is currently not on my to do list for any foreseeable future. If you find a cite for that, it would certainly be a good addition to the novel itself. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:33, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Main page errors
Hi Sca. I can see where you're coming from, there is always a certain amount of frustration when items don't appear in ITN that some readers would expect to see. However, we have a reasonably active community at WP:ITN/C who discuss this kind of thing, rather than relying on WP:ERRORS to claim an article should be posted. You would be best advised to contribute there, it would gain significantly more traction. Also, if you're afraid or are unable to use the template for a nomination, feel free to ask one of the many regulars to help, or just copy-and-paste one that already exists and amend it. You seem capable of adding wiki-code to the errors page, so I'm sure you'll soon adapt to be able to use the template. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:18, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Edward Snowden
Here, try this, add a nomination rationale, sign it and paste it at the top of the most appropriate date on ITN/C. I suspect 1 August is best since that's when the asylum was granted.
Blurb: American whistleblower Edward Snowden is granted temporary asylum in Russia. (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian, BBC, L.A. Times, VOA
Credits:
- Nominated by Sca (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Nominator's comments: After more than a month being holed up in the transit zone of Sheremetyevo airport in Moscow, the now-famous leaker of classified U.S. surveillance documents is granted asylum for one year in Russia and leaves the airport for an undisclosed location.
Let me know how it goes! The Rambling Man (talk) 14:19, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
- I readded the signature field, but otherwise all good, and you already have your first support. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:40, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yay. Main page, plus a picture too! Not so hard after all? Well done, and feel free to ping me if you need help with other technical issues. I'm happy to help wherever and whenever I can. Bon weekend. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Hugenots
If I am not mistaken, you made an edit earlier this year claiming that Lothar von Arnauld de la Perière was of Hugenot decent. Do you have any sources to support this claim, because I have not found anything that suggests he was, and have thus removed the word Hugenot. Just so you know. ÄDA - DÄP VA (talk) 15:57, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Inertia
The old New York Times used to proudly display on its front page, near the flag, the motto, "All the news that's fit to print." Perhaps English Wiki needs a motto, too. Recently, the redoubtable WP administrator David Levy said, in response to an editor's question, "... inertia is difficult to overcome around here." [1] Perhaps this could be our new motto at the top of the Main Page. Sca (talk) 16:22, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above suggestion makes an unfortunate amount of sense. I'd like to think that this might change, but that would entail overcoming the inertia's inertia. —David Levy 22:15, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- A fascinating concept. In the famed words of someone-or-other, I would say it is not unmeaningless. Sca (talk) 14:51, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- OTOH, perhaps inertia's inertia could be expressed as negative momentum. Sca (talk) 16:27, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- A fascinating concept. In the famed words of someone-or-other, I would say it is not unmeaningless. Sca (talk) 14:51, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
I've responded to you here. Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:41, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
I've finished doing a restoration of this; could you please review? Cheers, Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:19, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Feet of clay
Due to, among other things, Mr. Dylan's obnoxious 2014 Super Bowl ad, [1] I've added a strike-through to his name at the end of my user-page list of heroes, and a parenthetical note explaining that I remain a fan only of his sublime '60s and '70s work. The SB ad was the last straw. Sca (talk) 18:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Note to User:Medeis
- pointy
adjective \ˈpȯin-tē\
- having a somewhat sharp end : ending in a point
point•i•erpoint•i•est
- Full Definition of POINTY
- 1 coming to a rather sharp point
- 2 having parts that stick out sharply here and there
- refactor
The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary.
- — Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/
Sca (talk) 19:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Look, I have no grudge against you, and am not interested in carrying on a feud. "Pointy" is a wikipedia term, it is explained at WP:POINTY, and applied to your creating a second nomination for the same event who first nomination you were aware of and had opposed. Refactoring is defined in wiktionary, and applies to your changing other people's edits--which was especially problematic given you not only should not have done it, you lied about it in the edit summary by calling it a typo. I can tell you are upset, so I suggest we drop this, I know you are a long term editor, and I look forward to working with you constructively in the future. μηδείς (talk) 22:15, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- You don't seem to understand, or care, that pointy was personally offensive — or that I did what I did re the Ukraine ITN nomination in good faith.
- In my view, Wiktionary (which should be capitalized) has little standing in the world of English lexica. Refactor is not a word — but refractory is!
- Long term, as a compound modifier, should be hyphenated.
- Do widzenia. Sca (talk)
- PS: Thank you for removing "pointy" from Ukraine Violence.
- I apologize re "typo." Sca (talk) 16:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Ja Rusin byl i budu, Rusinom rodilsja. μηδείς (talk) 18:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Bing doesn't quite unlock the meaning of this. Ruthenian? Не знаю. (Some of my forebears hailed from Bessarabia.) Sca (talk) 22:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Ja Rusin byl i budu, Rusinom rodilsja. μηδείς (talk) 18:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Я русин був і буду. Я народився з рутенов. See here, which also uses the present jsem, although I was taught to sing it with only the past and future. There's also Idu do kraiju, de kurtsi sraju. μηδείς (talk) 03:12, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- One learns something new every day — never knew of Rusyns. Sca (talk) 16:13, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Я русин був і буду. Я народився з рутенов. See here, which also uses the present jsem, although I was taught to sing it with only the past and future. There's also Idu do kraiju, de kurtsi sraju. μηδείς (talk) 03:12, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Medeis: Naturally I removed your recent, fractious missive, which completely misinterpreted my last comment regarding the plural Nazis — for whom, obviously, I have no sympathy whatsoever.
- I will continue to edit misuses of the English language and other problems with articles. However, I will
- honor your request and never add anything else to the staggering 58,000 words on your talk page.
- As a quid pro quo:
- Please never post here again. Sca (talk) 15:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Sca. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |