User talk:Sbpat21

Welcome!

Hello, Sbpat21, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Ton e 17:30, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leonard Bernstein

Do you have a reference to confirm the info you added? David Underdown 08:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Doom Project

Dear Wikipedia members,

I suggest a new project, one that would completely finish a series of articles on Invader Zim episodes. I call it the Doom project. This project would complete the episode guide, and add trivia and quotes for Invader Zim episodes that do not have them.

Bush Shoot Out

A tag has been placed on Bush Shoot Out, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Bush Shoot Out. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:55, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citation problem

Hi, on the BAFTA page you replaced a {{fact}} template with a link to http://www.bookrags.com/wiki/Baftagate as a source (here).

While adding citations is generally good, the problem with this one is if you look closely at that page you'll see that it is actually an out of date copy of a deleted wikipedia page (that just copied text from this page itself), we can't really be using wikipedia as a source for verifying that wikipedia is correct. Just letting you know to take potential sources with a pinch of salt when adding them. MrWeeble Talk Brit tv 17:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mabuse (comics) article

Hi, I've been trying to expand this article, but I've been unable to find any info on him, or proof that he even exists. Do you know the title and issue number for his first appearance? Thanks! Konczewski 14:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the problem with including Mabuse is that Batman Black and White is not part of the regular DC continuity. Was he just in one issue?Konczewski 15:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Gay Animal Song

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Gay Animal Song, by SatyrTN (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Gay Animal Song seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Gay Animal Song, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Sbpat21! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

David Dobkin (director) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Facade (comics)

The article Facade (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for fictional characters.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 23:10, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Man Who Killed Batman

The article The Man Who Killed Batman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, no sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:36, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ace Chemicals

The article Ace Chemicals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Claritas § 13:18, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Media Whore for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Media Whore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media Whore until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SarahStierch (talk) 21:24, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Waking Dreams

The article Waking Dreams has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Rare for a short film to qualify for notability under WP:NFP. It is claimed that this won the audience award at the 2004 Boston Film Festival, but no source verifies this, and I'm not sure that would qualify this under WP:NFO in any case.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Carl (Spongebob Squarepants) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Carl (Spongebob Squarepants). Since you had some involvement with the Carl (Spongebob Squarepants) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:26, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Seargeant Slab Rankle" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Seargeant Slab Rankle and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 28#Seargeant Slab Rankle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]