User talk:Sbh69

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Sbh69, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Vince McMahon seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 14:34, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vince McMahon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 22:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Vince McMahon.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 22:18, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hulk Hogan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 00:35, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vince McMahon

You seriously need to learn how Wikipedia works. You can't make mass changes like that to an article without getting consensus. You've been warned about it several times. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 12:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sbh69. I appreciate removing old rumors, we need more of that around here. Some of the other changes worked and some didn't. For example, in the 2005-2007 section you removed a picture from 2007 and put one in from 2008. We try to keep headers as short as possible so I prefer not to add "Feud with Steve Austin" in "The Corporation", but that's just my opinion. Also, I prefer "1980s wrestling boom" because that's the name of the main article linked later on.

Also please be careful when you mark your edits as WP:MINOR. You're changing too much content for them to qualify as such.LM2000 (talk) 15:32, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at World Heavyweight Championship (WWE). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. This article is about the title, NOT the belt. There's a separate article for the belt. You have been told this by 2 different users. Stop making those changes. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 22:15, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve When We Were Young (Jo Harman song)

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Sbh69, thanks for creating When We Were Young (Jo Harman song)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. To be honest, it does not make a lot sense to me to have an article on a single song that has not been written about in independent, reliable sources, when there isn't even a discography for the Jo Harman article. What makes this song so special?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 22:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jensen (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scandanavian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of When We Were Young (Jo Harman song)

The article When We Were Young (Jo Harman song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 09:18, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]