User talk:Sazeed76

September 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Cox's Bazar Govt. High School. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 06:46, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cox's Bazar Govt. High School, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 06:48, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of বাঙালি

Hello Sazeed76,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged বাঙালি for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Danrok (talk) 22:46, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Please do not remove the {{copyvio}} template from articles, as you did with Surya Sen. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at Surya Sen/Temp. If you continue to insert copyright violations and/or remove copyright notices, you may be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 15:45, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violating copyright policy by restoring copyrighted text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that restoring such material is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Sazeed76 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

180.149.1.248 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Fox002801". The reason given for Fox002801's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Excirial (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: Autoblock removed. —DoRD (talk) 12:43, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Sazeed76 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

180.149.3.250 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Fox002801". The reason given for Fox002801's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Excirial (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: The above removal of your autoblock looks like it went through. Are you still not able to edit? What error message do you get, if so? - Vianello (Talk) 19:34, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-auto|1=180.149.31.253|2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Melinda503". The reason given for Melinda503's block is: "spambot".|3=Gogo Dodo|4=4549010}} {{unblock | reason=probably my IP was hacked by Melinda503 user. I only use wikipedia as sazeed76 user with this IP Sazeed76 (talk) 17:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)}}</nowiki>[reply]

Shutting off requests as autoblock has apparently expired and this user is editing right now. You may want to consider asking for an IP block exemption as this appears to be a recurrent problem. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:43, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

Please participate

There's a voting going on here. It needs to close, but consensus is not certain. We need more participation. The issues can't remain without a resolution. Please, check it out. Closure of the discussion has started. (refresh) Please, hurry. nafSadh did say 14:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]