User talk:Saywikiagain

Hi Saywikiagain! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 21:40, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rob Crow, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CLCStudent (talk) 21:25, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 21:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saywikiagain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was only updating the my own discography

Decline reason:

So you're saying you are Rob Crow? To prevent someone else from impersonating you, we'll need that confirmed via email. See IMPERSONATE for details. I apologize for the inconvenience, but I'm sure you'll appreciate that it's only meant to prevent random people from falsely claiming they're you. Huon (talk) 22:13, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sure you were. CLCStudent (talk) 22:07, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That was really Rob Crow who made all the edits source: https://twitter.com/rob5d4/status/1112718923319787522?s=19 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brizz9 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: @CLCStudent: Surprisingly, it does seem to have been Rob Crow. He should go through the email conf process (and likely isn't familiar with citation practices), but no need to snark. – SJ + 12:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'm sorry. CLCStudent (talk) 15:18, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editing your own page //

Hello Rob,

Please note who you are on your userpage once you can edit it again (after sending email to confirm you're you, per IMPERSONATE) -- especially if you're going to be making edits of any sort to your own article. That's usually not allowed, unless it is for small factual corrections. It's better to post updates to your article's talk page, then ask someone else on the wiki (like one of the past article editors) to make the update. Finally, include a link to a source for any information you add. We don't include first-hand information if it hasn't already been written about elsewhere. Warmly, – SJ + 12:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]