User talk:Saxifrage/Archive 9

Archive 5

←

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

The history of this archive begins at this diff and ends at this diff.

Image:TransLink (British Columbia) logo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:TransLink (British Columbia) logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. +mt 00:47, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

David webber

A tag has been placed on David webber, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Smashville 03:39, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

My apologies. Error corrected. Smashville 03:42, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikipita

No, that's what the article talk page is for. I've left numerous notes on his talk page though. GreenJoe 15:28, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

I left an olive branch on his talk page. GreenJoe 15:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion

Hi. A redirect you created 18 months ago, Hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia, has beel listed at Redirects for discussion. Please share your thoughts about it there. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 00:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia

I have nominated Hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 13:54, 11 July 2008 (U

GEN[M]AY

y u thro hate dood —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.163.17.52 (talk) 22:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Judging Weight

Saxifrage, I found a post you made to NPoV Talk (now archived), as follows: "You misunderstand: us editors need to be able to judge what should be included long before the readers can judge what to believe. How should we do this? — Saxifrage | ☎ 23:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC)"

Was such a process ever addressed anywhere in WP satisfactorily?

Thanks, SteveMc (talk) 02:02, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Sainte-Adèle, Quebec

Since you are the most voluminous contributor to Sainte-Adèle, Quebec, maybe you would be interested in the merger proposal now posted at the top of that article (from Saint-Adèle). Michael Hardy (talk) 20:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

A note re: Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review

Please be advised that I have recently conducted a review of the Rorschach test (formerly Rorschach inkblot test) talk page and archives. At some point, you have commented on the issue of the display and/or placement of the Rorschach inkblot image. Based on my understanding of your comment(s), I have placed you into one of three categories. I am issuing this note so that you can review how I have placed you, and to signal if this is an appropriate placement and/or to make known your current thoughts on this matter. You may either participate in discussion at the article talk page or leave a note at my talk page; but to keep things in one place, you should also clarify at Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review/addendum. Longer statements may be made here or quick clarifications/affirmations based on several pre-written statements can be made here. Best regards, –xeno^talk 15:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

I left a followup q, to see if you fit in any of the categories or just want me to indent and leave your updated comment below your line item. –xeno^talk 23:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

MSU Interview

Dear Saxifrage,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.9.34.167 (talk) 20:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Rough consensus

Wikipedia:Rough consensus, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Rough consensus and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Rough consensus during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Jreferee (talk) 13:37, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)