User talk:SavingWikiFromSpaming

Welcome!

Hi SavingWikiFromSpaming! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hi SavingWikiFromSpaming! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zeyan Shafiq that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you have allegations of sock puppetry, please make a report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations. Deletion discussions and user talk pages are the wrong places to make such allegations. There is no need to inform the subject of a sockpuppet investigation when you make a report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:03, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanku for guidance SavingWikiFromSpaming (talk) 07:15, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When you made the allegations in the deletion discussion,[1] you posted some evidence, including some links to Twitter. This evidence belongs in the sockpuppet report you posted. Please could you explain it more clearly in the sockpuppet investigation page, so that people understand how the two links are evidence of what you say.

If you look at the Editor interaction utility you will see what articles they have both edited. For each article there is a timeline - for example timeline for Talk:Zeyan Shafiq. This can be helpful in trying to check for evidence. It seemed to me that TheAafi was giving advice to Hums4r just like I am giving you advice now.

In the sockpuppet investigation, you did not ask for a checkuser. That is a tool that special people can use to check if someone is using two accounts from the same device. So if they are really the same person, it is good to ask for checkuser. The really great thing about checkuser, is that if it comes out positive, it is really hard for socks to get anyone to believe them.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message

Hello, SavingWikiFromSpaming. You have new messages at Kamilalibhat's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of TheRedReaper (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheAafi

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheAafi, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]