User talk:Savepeckhamarch

Welcome!

Hello, Savepeckhamarch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --McGeddon (talk) 17:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peckham Arch

Thanks, I've added that source and drawn some content from it. I can't see that it directly supports "100 flats promised, only 19 delivered", though - from these sources alone, it could be read as there being 100 flats spread around the entire square, and 19 of them on the actual site of the arch itself. If there has been a drop in the planned number, is there a source that can confirm this? --McGeddon (talk) 17:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Peckham Arch, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The source you cited says nothing about a campaign. McGeddon (talk) 12:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Peckham Arch. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

Can you explain at "Talk:Peckham Arch" why it's important to describe this particular construction as "unique"? McGeddon (talk) 15:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]