User talk:Savary34

Discuss the content, not the editor

RE [1], editor behavior discussions are done at admin boards, not article talk pages. This already was at ANEW (and was closed with protection probably since you continued to edit war with him, had you let the report play out the outcome may have been different), so I would hold off on further admin discussions right now. The content issue, of the section title should be easy to resolve on the talk page. And once a clear consensus is formed on the talk page, it shall also be easy to enforce. The moment you start discussing the other editor's behaviour there, he will reply and this will escalate and become long and convoluted, driving everyone else (who probably will support you on content here) away.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 12:40, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Eostrix: Understood, thank you for this message.I will no longer comment on Belyny's behavior--Savary34 (talk) 12:47, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 17:07, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Savary34. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 20:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:De Perier family

Hello, Savary34. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:De Perier family, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:De Perier family

Hello, Savary34. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "De Perier family".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]