User talk:Savagecrybaby

This is Savagecrybaby's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Hello, Savagecrybaby, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 19:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Woodoku (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Hello, Savagecrybaby! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

overlinking

Hello Savagecrybaby, thanks for your edits on Sinar Sumatra which I wrote a lot of a while ago. By the way, it's not necessary to link years in articles, let alone repeatedly. See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking#Linking_month-and-day_or_year. Pretty much anything that has been linked once in the intro and maybe once again in the body text doesn't have to be linked again from then on, but some things that are very commonplace and well understood don't have to be linked at all, to reduce visual clutter. Dan Carkner (talk) 16:30, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being so polite! I will definitely not link years anymore. I guess I get a little carried away with linking sometimes, especially when there is not much to edit. Savagecrybaby (talk) 17:10, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK, I started off doing it that way years ago too. It seems logical to link for more info but I guess it goes against the preferred style guide. Dan Carkner (talk) 03:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Woodoku

Hello, Savagecrybaby. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Woodoku, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Woodoku

Hello, Savagecrybaby. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Woodoku".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Pauper Press, Inc moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Peter Pauper Press, Inc, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 20:20, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please tell me which sources are not able to be used so that I can remove them? Savagecrybaby (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Peter Pauper Press, Inc

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Peter Pauper Press, Inc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 20:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined this one as well and stubbed the draft. Notability is not shown for this company; see WP:CORP for what is needed.

Importantly, from your edits it looks as if you are connected with Peter Pauper Press or being paid to contribute this content. If this is so, you must disclose it; see WP:Paid editing for details and instructions. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am actually not connected to Peter Pauper Press. I am just new to Wikipedia and am making a lot of new articles, so I'm not really used to the promotional tone rule. I really appreciate you guys helping me learn though. I actually made this page because another page I made, Christine Poggi, links to Peter Pauper Press but there was no page for it so I made one. Also did you see the most recent edits that have been made to this? Savagecrybaby (talk) 23:20, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'd recommend slowing down and concentrating on one article at a time. Christine Poggi might be a good one to work on because I'm fairly sure the subject is notable. For Peter Pauper Press, what you need is several independent sources like the Heller article that talk about the press itself in depth. This can be very hard to find for small specialist presses, I know -- one of my very first articles was a small poetry press. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 23:49, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ETA. Not my area, but I think Peter Pauper Press is probably notable. I've added some hits from Proquest/Ebsco to the draft. You can probably get acess to them via the WP:Resource Request board, if you don't want to wait till you can access the WP:Wikipedia Library yourself. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! Savagecrybaby (talk) 20:08, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Christine Poggi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Christine Poggi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 20:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined this and tried to clean the article up. It looks as if the subject is likely to be notable under one or both of WP:PROF and WP:AUTHOR. The easiest way of proving notability in this case will be to find book reviews of her academic books and cite them. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 22:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! Thank you so much for helping me learn as a Wikipedia contributor. Savagecrybaby (talk) 23:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Pauper Press, Inc (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Very small article. Only 1 reliable source... please read WP:42

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Pauper Press, Inc and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 23:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Genesis flood narrative that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 19:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Peter Pauper Press, Inc

Hello, Savagecrybaby. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter Pauper Press, Inc, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Peter Pauper Press, Inc

Hello, Savagecrybaby. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Peter Pauper Press".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]