User talk:Satyr22

Welcome!

Hello, Satyr22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Alexander vershinin, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:09, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alexander vershinin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alexander vershinin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:09, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alexander Vershinin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alexander Vershinin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 05:52, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexander Vershinin

The article Alexander Vershinin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 08:56, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexander Vershinin

The article Alexander Vershinin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article was BLP PRODded on the day of creation, but this was removed 3 days later by someone with a Moscow IP address. The original article included an interview and was clearly (even more so than now) created for the purpose of self-publicity. There is no indication in the article that this photographer is in any way notable, and I cannot find anything online that suggests he is. The link to his "fan website" redirects to his own website.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mustermark 23:01, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexander Vershinin

The article Alexander Vershinin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Alexf^(talk) 12:17, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alexander Vershinin, you may be blocked from editing. Alexf^(talk) 15:50, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue, as you did at Alexander Vershinin. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 18:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:25, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Alexander Vershinin. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KSFT ^C 18:34, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alexander Vershinin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander Vershinin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Vershinin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:21, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your block expires in 12 hours, after which you may contribute to the deletion discussion, which will run for 7 days. If you continue your disruptive behavior the block will be made permanent. See WP:BIO, WP:CREATIVE and WP:SIGCOV for examples of what a subject must meet in order for inclusion. You will need sources of course, which previously you claimed were not necessary. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:23, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm Optakeover. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:Alexf because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover ^(Talk) 22:09, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User:Orangemike, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The Dissident Aggressor 05:28, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 13:44, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]