User talk:Satrianneh

Thank You zzuzz

Thanks a lot Zzuzz for lifting my IP autoblock and created an exception. :) satr (talk) 10:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm autoblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Satrianneh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been autoblocked. I am not a Zombie Computer, oh come on :)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; you must use {{unblock-auto}} for this Daniel Case (talk) 14:40, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm sorry, we need the information from the message you see when you try to edit to try and find the autoblock. Syrthiss (talk) 13:00, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Satrianneh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

202.138.246.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

{{blocked proxy}} <-- 202.138.242.28:8080 -->

Blocking administrator: ProcseeBot (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: The bot appears to be correct; you appear to be connecting through an openly accessible web proxy, which editors are not permitted to edit from for security reasons. Specifically, port 8080 is open for users to connect through. Is there some particular reason you're connecting through this proxy? If there is an unavoidable reason for connecting in this manner, an exception could be made for your account. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:34, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anyways, it says this "You are currently unable to edit pages on Wikipedia.

You can still read pages, but you cannot edit, change, or create them.

Editing from 202.138.246.2 has been disabled by ProcseeBot for the following reason(s): Banned proxys.png This IP address has been blocked because it is believed to be an open proxy or zombie computer. To prevent abuse, these proxies may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If your ISP has misconfigured its proxy, you can try bypassing it by logging into Wikimedia's secure gateway at https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/. For more information about open proxies and what you can do, please see the WikiProject on open proxies. (Multi-RBL lookup • Sandbox test edit)

This block has been set to expire: 18:07, January 18, 2010.

Even if blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and contact other editors and administrators by e-mail.

Note: Please use the [show] links across from each header to show more information."

And I did what was told on the 'What do I do now section.' Sorry I'm not really keen at editing things here, even my own talk page :) satr (talk) 09:04, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Me

{{unblock-auto}}

Hello mods and admins, Hersfold asked me whether I really had to use port 8080 to get connected to the Internet. Well the reason is yes, because I don't use any proxy server and it seems like that it's my ISP that sets that for me to get connected the Internet through port 8080. Could any mod or admin create an exception for me please? :) I hate to be blocked from editing and posting anywhere but my own talk page. satr (talk)

You have been affected by an open proxy on your ISP's network; your ISP seems to be passing both your traffic through the same caching proxy (proxy4.melsa.net.id). This is not so unusual, and is usually only a temporary problem. I'm willing to temporarily grant you WP:IPBE on this basis, until it's no longer needed. Please read the policy carefully. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 20:38, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Menamestaken

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Menamestaken, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Therexbanner (talk) 18:23, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]