User talk:Satoshi Kondo

Welcome!

Hello, Satoshi Kondo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 17:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Satoshi Kondo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Satoshi Kondo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Altaic languages

If there is a recent study about the relationship of Japanese and the putative Altaic proto-language, it would be very helpful to include it, with a full citation, in the Altaic languages article.

But we don't generally don't consider that one article supersedes all previous articles, and debunks them (I assume that is what you meant by "depunk", which is not an English word). Anyway, the article already presents Altaic in general, and the Altaic-Japanese connection in particular, as "widely seen as discredited" and "not widely accepted". --Macrakis (talk) 19:47, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Kemalism

Hello, I'm Amccann421. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amccann421 (talk) 16:03, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:09, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GAB^gab 19:23, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, kindly asking for unblock and further information

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Satoshi Kondo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I was blocked for sock puppetry about 10 months ago. I know that the creation and POV pushing was a big mistake and I am sorry for that. I have learnd over the time that it is better to stop trying to push my opinion and several contents/sources into an article but instead to use the talk page and keep calm. I learnd that an article should also be neutral and that it was wrong to delete the parts I did not like/belive. I further apologize for the creation of several sock puppets to envade the block.
I apologize for my actions and kindly ask for an unblock and a new begin on the english wikipedia. I am ready to work with all users and admins and I will follow all rules and will accept the conclusions on talk pages.
Here I want to give further informations about the classification of the other sock puppets. This account is the master account created 15:24, 25 March 2016. I stop using it till 12:53, 11 August 2017 where i started again using this account. In the mean time I created the User:일성강, User:Kumasojin 熊襲, User:X_Aterui_x, User:GoguryeoHistorian, User:Nam_Việt_18, User:FreeTaiwan and User:WhiteTeaWiki. I and my created sock puppets are not connected to the Worldcreatorfighter under i am currently classificated, but i admit that the edit history seems very similar, but there are some differences. I only wanted to say this to show my cooperation and maybe it helps categorizing the socks or something. Again I am very sorry and I hope that I get a second chance on the english wikipedia. Satoshi Kondo (talk) 15:36, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not eligible for unblock consideration at this time, as WhiteTeaWiki (talk · contribs) was editing less than six months ago. Once six months has passed, you may be able to apply under WP:SO. However, there's no guarantee that your unblock request will be granted. You may be considered de-facto banned, under WP:3X. Yamla (talk) 17:20, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ah, ok. I have read about the six month rule before but I have not looked at the edits of WhiteteaWiki. Nevertheless Thank you Satoshi Kondo (talk) 17:31, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]