User talk:Satnder63

Welcome!

Hi, Satnder63. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Harpal Kumar

When links are red, it doesn't mean they are "broken", it just means that the articles haven't been created yet so there is no need to remove those links. Thanks. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of World Youth Organization (United Kingdom)

The article World Youth Organization (United Kingdom) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable organization, fails WP:ORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of World Youth Organization (United Kingdom) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Youth Organization (United Kingdom) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Youth Organization (United Kingdom) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How? References to IMDB, Charity Commission, News reports, and IPO. This has been so wrongly nominated. Satnder63 (talk) 20:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]