User talk:SatinderMullick

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, SatinderMullick, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Conflict of interest

Regarding endoscopy, please review this guideline with respect to depositing your son's biography there. If he is truly such a good scientist he should not need Wikipedia as a platform. JFW | T@lk 22:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also regarding endoscopy, I removed most of the material that you added about the miniature capsule. It was confusing and cited no sources. Feel free to include sources such as patent information and links to articles discussing the usage and FDA approval of the item.Patrick Berry 17:06, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I re-did the material that you added back to endoscopy. I referenced it to the USPTO webpage. You are also not formatting your entries correctly. You may want to practice in the sandbox for a bit before adding more entries.Patrick Berry 17:52, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article MICROGIZMO LLC has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 19:25, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most of your work is without references or proof, and are not written in the "wikipedia" way. You write as to praise your son, rather than give facts. dairygirl224 16.40 29 January 2007

I'm going to transgress a bit, but honestly -- what kind of doctor are you? That is a rhetorical question. You care more about promoting your son and his company rather than promoting knowledge. Here at Wikipedia, we strive to provide a means for people to learn; to learn objective facts, not SPAM. Though I have much experience with corrupt doctors, I still find it unsettling. Perhaps it is cultural, but Westerners consider you to have a conflict of interest and that should prohibit you from editing the articles related to endoscopy. - Cyborg Ninja 09:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delnor Hospital

The article Delnor Hospital has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 18:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should research your articles. I have added a history of the hospital. Racepacket 04:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Capsule Endoscopy

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Capsule Endoscopy, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. While your contributions are appreciated, creating and editing pages in order to promote your son's work is against Wikipedia policy. Please refrain from doing so in the future. Thanks. Jehfes 05:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Miniature Ingestible Capsule. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. utcursch | talk 05:09, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello;
       The edits are an attempt to present the ALL and CORRECT FACTS about this great revolutionary technology in one place--Wikipedia.Examples:
      US Patent office rejection of Claims 1,2,3 and 11 of Iddan's patent in 2006
      Patent Court case is going on.
The jury/Judge will determine which patent is basic.So Please refrain from being the JUDGE.

          I have no agenda--I do not try to hide my name by selecting phony ID's.
   I did not write Wireless Capsule Endoscopy article-but I added additional information as I found it for Dr.OZ/Oprah's show and Sayaka's new Capsule.
           Most of the other URL on internet are technical or press releases by Given Imaging and Olympus Corp. with slight bias.
           Try to find--The rejection of Iddan's four claims by USPTO--you wo'nt find it.
           Likewise for Court case under Judge Gardner.
                    Good day!  Dr.Satinder Mullick--Coauthor of One of the best article on Forecasting in 1971 in Harvard Business Review--educated at Johns Hopkins Univ.

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 14:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your ignorance of Wikipedia policies

I can no longer ignore your violation of Wikipedia policies. These are some of your violations for the various capsule endoscopy articles:

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

You also removed the tags for the AfD discussions, which is a serious violation. At the moment, I am choosing not to notify the administrators in hope for your cooperation. Please do not edit the articles related to capsule endoscopy any longer. It's better if you discuss it on the talk page, and I and other users will add them with the right Wikipedia formatting. - Cyborg Ninja 21:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't blank talk pages

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Capsule endoscopy. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 15:10, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]