User talk:Sarmadys

Welcome!

License tagging for File:MitchellWaite.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MitchellWaite.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mitchell Waite

The article Mitchell Waite has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite (talk) 02:55, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: MathMaven

Hello, Sarmadys. You have new messages at MathMaven's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Meshkat (Cruise Missile), Sarmadys!

Wikipedia editor Lionratz just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can add more details about this in other sections

To reply, leave a comment on Lionratz's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Iranian Space Agency

Hello. I could use your input over at the Iranian Space Agency article. I tried making a compromise, and I would like your input on it. The Scythian 21:24, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Qaher-313

Regarding this edit I just wanted to note to you that you changed the wording of an actual quote. The BBC article actually says "looks like a cheap copy of the American F22". You can't edit quotes like that to change their meaning on Wikipedia. - Ahunt (talk) 12:39, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The quote is there but the affiliation and profession of the person is added. Sarmadys (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And stop challenging and ridiculing everyone when you raise more issues and conflict than actual contributions. Mightyname (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see when I did ridicule you or anyone. I objected to your added phrase and the conclusion which was NOT from the article. The conclusion that the list of spaecifications published by MehrNews did not match the mockup was your, not David Cenciotti's. MehrNews is a news agency. It publishes follow-ups to different stories. That does not mean it is in response to anything.Sarmadys (talk) 17:41, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war on Qaher-313

Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Qaher-313.

While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.

If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see dispute resolution. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.

If you feel your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting page protection or a sockppuppet investigation is a much better course of action.

Continued edit warring on Qaher-313 or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 16:40, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you be more specific on the warning you have posted on my page? Which edits? I have returned content removal by anonymous editors. A temporary page protection (for anonymous IPs and unverified accounts) was in place but it has been expired. Sarmadys (talk) 16:55, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mitchell Waite

The article Mitchell Waite has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I searched for, but could not find, the significant coverage in reliable independent sources that Wikipedia requires to demonstrate that subject meets notability criteria. Sources provided are primary, and Google hits are book sales and social networking.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dawn Bard (talk) 16:22, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Icslogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Icslogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless

Plese read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:14, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:INIOAS Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:INIOAS Logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:32, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Granton Institute of Technology

The article Granton Institute of Technology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence article meets WP:COMPANY or WP:GNG; only found trivial or minor mentions in G* search that do not suggest likelihood of additional sources; as closed institution, not going to be generating additional material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 16:01, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cleveland Institute of Electronics (logo).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cleveland Institute of Electronics (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Pbrks (talk) 14:16, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Icsbooks.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Icsbooks.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:37, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mitchell Waite for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitchell Waite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitchell Waite until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SL93 (talk) 01:32, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]