User talk:Sarcasto

Talk at me here. I might actually listen.

Welcome!

Hello, Sarcasto, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

You might also find these policies and guidelines useful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Getting the articles just right can be tricky - but there are lots of people to ask!

If you have any questions, just click on the Contact Me link after my signature at the end of this section. Alternatively, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question.

By the way, when you are writing on a discussion page (or someone's talk page), it is considered good manners to sign your comment... to do this, just add ~~~~ at the end of your comment. That will put your user name (Sarcasto) and the date/time at the end (or you can click on the icon when you are editing. Never sign on an article page - only on a discussion page.

There are several ways of getting help:

Leave a message on this page. It is on my watchlist, which means that I can see when the page is changed!
Leave a message on my talk page
Go into IRC Channel #wikipedia-en-help
Leave a message on this page starting with {{helpme}} followed by your question - someone in the IRC help room will be over as soon as possible
Leave a question on the Help Desk or on the New Contributors' Help Page

I am now going to sign this message with my signature, by adding ~~~~ here: -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 08:49, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted Edit

If you see I reverted one of your edits. It was simply you added a broken redirect. Please use [[]] not {{}}, You did no wrong doing. Joe Gazz84 (user)•(talk)•(contribs) 00:40, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Hutchinson

The NY Times bit about him is his filmography - nothing about him, and so is not significant coverage. The other references likewise basically give a filmography, but aren't the significant coverage of him.

As I still am not convinced that he meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, I am going to take the article to Articles for Deletion.

Also, I *did* find the NY Times 'coverage' when looking for references, and found that it was his filmography - that basically means that he is worthy of a mention in the cast section of the articles about the films etc in which he has appeared. Perhaps you can find some decent coverage about him showing that he is more than the bit player which he appears to be?

Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 08:49, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Joshua Hutchinson

An article that you have been involved in editing, Joshua Hutchinson, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Hutchinson. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:01, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ned Stuart

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ned Stuart, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ned Stuart. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:09, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Archenemies in Television

The article Archenemies in Television has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fundamentally subjective, dependent on OR, too often inaccurate (eg, Buddy Sorell not a lead character; most entries treat recurring comic bits as ongoing dramatic conflict. One might as well juxtapose Ralph and Alice Kramden.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Keith Olbermann catch phrases for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Keith Olbermann catch phrases, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Olbermann catch phrases until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 01:59, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Olbermann catch phrases. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 18:28, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, friend

Following up on the above, please don't assume that the challenge of the Olbermann piece is a right wing hit... Actually, at least from my standpoint, it's the opposite: protecting the neutrality of wikipedia from a right wing incursion. Unless pretty clearly political stuff like this is ruled out, the onslaught will follow. I appreciate the hard work you put into the piece, it's just pretty clearly out of bounds in terms of neutrality. Please do keep writing for Wikipedia though... Carrite (talk) 02:08, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]