User talk:Sarah Baartman

Welcome!

Hello, Sarah Baartman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 16:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think

you mean posterior — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medeis (talk • contribs)

Nope, but Sagittarian Milky Way probably did. Sarah Baartman (talk) 16:34, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for inappropriate use of multiple accounts by User:Trio The Punch. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:47, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After our conversation at User talk:Trio The Punch, it appears that you do not need this account for any of the legitimate uses of a sockpuppet account, but are using it primarily to make personal attacks. I'm not sure why you made that choice, but since you don't need the second account, I've disabled it for you. Please remember in the future that you will generally only need one account. Thanks! -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:47, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sarah Baartman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

trolling admins? wtf? WP:INVOLVED? Time for a recall!

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:03, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're very fast; you put up your unblock request before I had finished typing the block notice. I'm not involved in any sense, other than the sense that you asked me to review a block of yours. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:47, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you felt insulted by my response to your comment. You abused the power we gave you as an admin to block me because you dislike me. Blocks are used to protect this wiki, they are not punitive and you shouldn't use them to get rid of anyone who annoys you by disagreeing with you or criticizing you. Sarah Baartman (talk) 16:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC) p.s. Are you open to recall? p.p.s. I never asked you to review a unblock request.[reply]

You are not blocked. Your account, User:Trio The Punch, is still able to edit- I did not block your ability to use it when I disabled this second account. Do you have any other accounts? You only need one to edit with. Please feel free to begin a discussion at the appropriate place about whether my administrative buttons should be removed; you have the ability to begin discussions with your User:Trio The Punch account. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:52, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am blocked, my account is blocked. And not to protect the 'pedia because I am a vandal, just because I criticized you. That means you have abused the trust we gave you. I invite you to apologize. You should probably do it quickly before some dramamongering idiots discover the error you've made. Sarah Baartman (talk) 16:54, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you unable to use User:Trio The Punch? I carefully avoided blocking the ip address you are using, so that it wouldn't interfere with your ability to edit. What message do you see when you try to edit with that account? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing the subject. The topic at hand is more important: how do you justify blocking this account? I hope you do realize you are not allowed to do that, because you are abusing the trust we gave you by giving you a blockbutton to take revenge on people who disagreed with you. Its a great way to get desysoped, but I don't think it is worth it. We gave you that button to protect Wikipedia, not to block everyone you dislike... Sarah Baartman (talk) 16:59, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sarah Baartman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

normally when people scream about admin abuse they are full of shit. But in this case it is clear as day. I included a list of my contributions below. FisherQueen pretends I was using my account primarily to make personal attacks but in reality FisherQueen blocked me because I criticized FisherQueen.

Decline reason:

Checkuser-confirmed sockpuppet of Trio The Punch as shown at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Trio The Punch. I am revoking talk page access for this account and the other involved sockpuppets. De728631 (talk) 17:27, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reviewing admin, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Trio The Punch might be relevant. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:21, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My edits

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Read Thermodynamic system#Isolated_system and Isolated system. Sarah Baartman (talk) 16:38, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stop talking about my anterior please. Sarah Baartman (talk) 18:02, 20 November 2012 (UTC) (this is a joke, see here)[reply]

Nope, but Sagittarian Milky Way probably did. Sarah Baartman (talk) 16:34, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Sarah Baartman (talk) 21:21, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Baartman for president! (on my userpage)

Some wikignoming

More wikignoming

And more wikignoming

Editsummaries are summaries. If I, for example, revert 5 trolls and fix a typo I am probably too lazy to write "+typo" in the editsummary. ~~But we agree that you are not a troll, just ill-informed,~~ if I would have an infinite amount of time and patience I would've written "rv trolls and people who are too lazy to read" and explained it all very slowly and clearly. I am not really a fan of people who are too lazy to spend some time reading before posting a comment. It is especially problematic if admins are too lazy to read enough to understand the situations they deal with. Bad admins have caused more damage on Wikipedia than skilled trolls. Sarah Baartman (talk) 14:37, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, FisherQueen, you disappoint me. Please reread that sentence. You wrote: "I'm sorry that you didn't understand my comment, or why your edits were inappropriate". So basically you are insulting me while pretending to be sorry for something that hasn't happened. I invite you apologize. Sarah Baartman (talk) 16:39, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you must've made a typo, I did not see your apology. Please try again. Sarah Baartman (talk) 16:42, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for proving my point. I striked through part of my comment above. Sarah Baartman (talk) 16:43, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.