User talk:SarahR2

Welcome!

Hello, SarahR2! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Anshuahuja01 (talk) 10:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

SarahR2, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SarahR2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi SarahR2! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Needed help with review of new article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dil Dosti Dance has been accepted

Dil Dosti Dance, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2pou (talk) 17:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dil Dosti Dance has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed ~~at Draft:Dil Dosti Dance~~ below. Thanks! 2pou (talk) 16:57, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Looks like SarahR2 has pretty much started from scratch after draftification and WP:COPYVIO removals. The new article appears well referenced and meets WP:NTV as one that reached a national audience. Awards help as well, but additional sources for each year would help. This can be done in main space. 2pou (talk) 16:57, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Although TellyChakkar has been questioned as a RS in the past, the awards are more factual in nature. Recommend seeking alternative sources for anything that might not be interpreted as facts. TellyChakkar and the Indian Telly Awards are also essentially the same (sister sites per linked discussions), they are technically independent of the show, so they are acceptable here. I would still recommend replacing cites with alternative outlets, if they're available. 2pou (talk) 16:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, nice work for your first article! I was debating Start class or C-class. I went start for additional sources on the awards, but this was a good job! -2pou (talk) 17:11, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@2pou:Thank you so much for your feedback and for publishing the draft! Really appreciate it. I was iffy about the Tellychakkar articles as well, but the dilemma is that it's the only portal that widely covers Indian television news. I will try to find additional sources though. The awards have been confirmed by the cast and crew in certain interviews & Google too displays them as nominated but I can't seem to find the entire nomination lists, only the winners are available. Will try to dig more though. Thanks a bunch for your kind feedback :) SarahR2 (talk) 17:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shreedhari Devi (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ts12rAc was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shreedhari Devi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shreedhari Devi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 18:01, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shreedhari Devi (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Missvain were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi. The sources presented are either (1) unreliable and can't establish notability as they are primary sources; (2) do not mention Shreedhari Devi at all; or (3) don't mention Shreedhari Devi in enough detail to establish notability. Based on what is presented, it appears WP:TOOSOON for Shreedhari Devi to have a Wikipedia article. I encourage you to contribute to Wikipedia in other ways, including improving articles that exist already about similar subjects. Feel free to seek assistance at WP:TEAHOUSE if you wish. Thank you for your contributions!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shreedhari Devi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shreedhari Devi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 17:01, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shreedhari Devi

Hello, SarahR2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shreedhari Devi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shreedhari Devi

Hello, SarahR2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Shreedhari Devi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]