User talk:Sarah.isaacs

This user is a student editor in North_Dakota_State_University/PSYC_480_History_and_Systems_of_Psychology_(Spring,_2018) .

Nice job on training modules and user page Sarah! J.R. Council (talk) 03:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Sarah.isaacs, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment 3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_Behavior_Checklist

Hi guys, I thought this might be a good article that we could start on, what do you think? There is a few chapters that focus on behavior, specifically chapter 9. The Child Behavior Checklist is a questionnaire that is given to asses and diagnose behavioral problems. I have found a few websites that would be great resources to start with.

This is one that I found that discusses how the Child Behavioral Checklist is actually now renamed  the "Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment" after Thomas M. Achenbach, the founder of the Child behavioral checklist (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3362998/ ). This is not even discussed in the Wikipedia article so this could be part that we include. Let me know what you guys think!

Sarah Isaacs Sarah.isaacs (talk) 21:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is also another good article that could use some improving. It is about Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia, she is mentioned in chapter 2 of the book. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elisabeth_of_the_Palatinate Megan Boehm (talk) 00:47, 7 February 2018 (UTC) I think doing the princess would be interesting but worried if she would have enough information regarding psychology that we could mention. Sarah.isaacs (talk) 15:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC) Megan Boehm (talk) 00:43, 7 February 2018 (UTC)I looked up Elizabeth Scarborough and she focused on female psychologists and the history of psychology. There seems to be good content and enough articles to write a well documented page.Alyssa.wroblewski (talk) 01:00, 7 February 2018 (UTC) I think doing a female who is under appreciated in psychology would be very interesting. I tried finding information on a different person and there wasn't very much out there. If we think there is enough on Elizabeth Scarborough then I think that would be a good topic to go with.Alyssa.wroblewski (talk) 01:08, 7 February 2018 (UTC) Sarah, I like the idea for the topic of the Child Behavioral checklist, especially since it relates to research that we did the Infant Cognitive Development lab here as NDSU. I checked out the resource that you linked and it seemed like it had a lot of good information! Either this topic or the one Megan suggested I would be OK with doing. If another groups uses Elizabeth Scarborough I think using the Child Behavior Checklist would be a good place to start considering you've found multiple websites already, and its not in the Wikipedia article. Jalen Allison (talk) 01:23, 7 February 2018 (UTC) I will email Dr. Council with our two options.Megan Boehm (talk) 01:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your topic

I think Elizabeth Scarborough is a great choice. She does not seem to have a Wikipedia article, but there is a lot of material on her elsewhere. J.R. Council (talk) 22:10, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Elizabeth Scarborough.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Elizabeth Scarborough.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 05:01, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Elizabeth Scarborough.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Elizabeth Scarborough.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:48, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You messed up an article very badly

You edited the article about living science fiction and fantasy writer Elizabeth Ann Scarborough, by conflating her with another person entirely. Elizabeth is very unhappy, naturally enough, to be confused with another person (one she agrees should have an article written about her) and declared dead. Please be more careful in the future. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]