User talk:Sarag720
| This user is a student editor in University_of_Pittsburgh/The_Archaeologist_Looks_at_Death_(Fall_2020) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Sarag720, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:11, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Hi, This is Sofia Lagazzi, I am doing your peer review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sofialr3931 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Hi Sarag720, I am your peer reviewer, and I am sorry for the late message, I got a little confused with the instructions but hopefully you saw my Peer Review template. Overall, I think you have great ideas for your article. I re read your sandbox again and I can see that you have tons of great sources. I checked most of them and they all seem like legitimate sources that can be trusted. You have a very clear plan of what you want to add to your article, and you are doing a great job at completing sections that are missing some information (like your plan to add to the background section). You are on track to making this a much better article than the original.
Pretty much everything I had noted you talked about in your sandbox, like adding more information to the "Process" and "Prohibition of the Practice" sections. The lead needed some work as I noted in my Peer Review template, and I see that you added more information and it looks way more complete now. I also think that the Background section looks pretty long and complete, so adding more information to the other two sections I talked about before might be beneficial to make the article look more balanced. Another thing I might add would be a couple of pictures, since the current article only has one at the beginning. I think that when Wikipedia articles have more pictures, it is more enjoyable to read because it gives you an idea of what to imagine. Especially when it comes to events or things that happened many many years ago. Overall you are doing an amazing job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sofialr3931 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)