User talk:Saraband2004

HELLO WORLD

Proposed deletion of Voronoi formula

The article Voronoi formula has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, and no links to other articles. As a result of the lack of links, hard to understand. Needs expansion. Delete if not expanded.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:53, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why I deleted your listing

Hi, when I deleted the listing it was a red link, which means the page did not yet exist, but I can see now that the link is blue meaning it now exists. Please understand that I can feel you frustration as I am currently trying to restore a lot of deleted articles. Davidgoodheart (talk)

Yingying Zhang article

Hello, I saw you created the article Disappearance of Yingying Zhang. I wrote Kidnapping of Yingying Zhang. Maybe the two articles could be merged? Also pinging Davidgoodheart. -- AlmostGrad (talk) 06:56, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't me who created the article, the person who did create the article agreed to merge on your talk page, and I have moved all the info needed from your article on to their article. Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Falun Gong.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You have made repeated controversial edits to this page. Please begin a discussion on the talk page if you wish to proceed. The question of how to characterize FG has been long debated (as is obvious from the talk page). Cleopatran Apocalypse (talk) 14:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Cleopatran Apocalypse (talk) 14:42, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]