User talk:Sara050719

November 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Taylor Kinney, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.

Agreed. Please engage in discussion. Reverting with the same copy-and-pasted edit summary is not going to accomplish anything. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 06:37, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have already given a valid reason for editing so I don't understand why it has been removed. It's written that sources can't be GOSSIPS or RUMORS so I don't understand why you don't want to remove the article based on rumors and gossips, because Gaga, Kinney or their reps haven't confirmed "break-up" or "cancelling the engagement". Everything else are just gossips that aren't reliable so I would like to know why it's accepted. Sara050719 ^talk? 16:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Sara050719! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Border Town ‖ 20:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Taylor Kinney

Hi there. I've reverted your edit on Taylor Kinney as there needs to be a consensus gained for the article to have the information removed through a discussion on the talk page. Another editor has already started a thread on there to discuss their view as to why the information should stay. Due to a reliable source having been provided, Wikipedia policy on living persons provides that this information needs to remain until a consensus and reliable sources are gained to change this position.

In addition, as you have came very close to having attempted to remove the content three times in 24 hours, you are at risk of breaching the 3 revert rule, which can see you blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you believe that there does need to be a change made, please discuss it on the talk page before attempting to make the edit again. Thank you and happy editing! -- sandgemADDICT ^yeah? 06:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]