User talk:Saobi

Speedy deletion of Vicki Iseman

A tag has been placed on Vicki Iseman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shootthedevgru (talk) 01:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Peking Duck, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Peking Duck was changed by Saobi (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-21T01:50:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Peking duck. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Peking duck was changed by Saobi (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-02-21T01:59:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 02:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 02:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Peking Duck. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 02:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blog.

I deleted your page, as articles on blogs do not belong on wikipedia. They do not meet the notability criteria, and can be deleted per WP:CSD#A7. · AndonicO ^Hail! 02:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peking Duck Blog article

One of the key criteria for articles is verifiability. A subject not only has to be notable—in this case, notable web content—but also must be able to demonstrate that through reliable sources. I didn't delete the article, but the lack of sources is probably the key to why it was deleted. More to the point, finding reliable sources can do the most to advance the case for why the article should stay. —C.Fred (talk) 02:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]