User talk:Sankazim

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Emanuele, welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any dicussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know -- and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!

Thanks for adding the Enaction article. I hope you will expand on it as well as add other useful content to Wikipedia.

Once again, welcome to Wikipedia!

--A. B. 03:39, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Enaction

Greetings! I see that you have begun an article on enaction in the Wikipedia. I have some concerns with the article as it stands now that I hope you could address.

Specifically, the article does not go into the subject beyond the first two paragraphs of the article. While this gives me a basic definition of the concept, it does not go far enough to give good encyclopedic coverage of the subject.

Currently, the article has been proposed for deletion, on the grounds that articles should provide more than just a basic definition. I support the deletion because of the limited scope of the article as it stands now. However, if you (or another editor) are able to expand the article—examples, more walkthroughs of the major principles, etc.—then I would be swayed to support the continued existence of the article.

Again, thank you for your contributions, and I do look forward to both seeing you expand it and to editing other articles in the Wikipedia! —C.Fred (talk) 04:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move of Enaction to Enactive interfaces

The article Enaction you originated in 2006 has been moved to Enactive interfaces and Enaction is nominated for deletion. Some material in Enaction related to Enactivism has been moved to that page.

The article Enactive interfaces has no sources whatsoever, and you might consider adding some references to support its content. That would be most appreciated. Brews ohare (talk) 16:08, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]