User talk:Sanju Satish Raman

Sanju Satish Raman, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sanju Satish Raman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Masumrezarock100 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Sanju Satish Raman, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ravensfire (talk) 12:29, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

May 2019

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tuntari, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 12:30, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sarkar (2018 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:45, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Sarkar (2018 film), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Begoon 04:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thuppakki

This source clearly states that Thuppakki's audio launch happened on 10 October 2012. Why do you keep changing it to the 12th? --Kailash29792 (talk) 04:26, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Remo (film). Begoon 04:27, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Muppozhudhum Un Karpanaigal, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

You removed an existing reference and added unsourced content, again with no explanation
There will be no more warnings Begoon 04:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Geniac (talk) 04:38, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 06:26, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sanju Satish Raman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the reason why I have been blocked for. I have read all the guidelines of Wikipedia and understand the rules and regulations, following how to contribute to the encyclopedia. I may refrain myself from editing disruptively, and I wish, I would like to do productive contributions and also to continue editing, through my original account. I make sure that, this will not happen again. Sanju Satish Raman (talk) 07:23, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please see the standard offer. If you can go six months without any sock puppetry (or editing as an IP editor), we'll consider an unblock request. Also, it's silly to insist that accounts like Sanju the king are not you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:22, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You say "through my original account" - would you please list all other accounts which you have used to edit wikipedia? To clarify, I'm assuming that will include all the accounts listed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Satish Raman Nair/Archive, and any others?
Additionally, could you explain why you used all of those accounts, and why things will be different in future? Thank you. -- Begoon 07:46, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Satish Raman Nair - This account is my father's account and he is also a Wikipedian,and Sanuj Satish 2006 - is my brother's account, also a Wikipedian. I used these account, when it was blocked. And I feel foolish about my part being involved in sock puppetry and IP socking. Since, I have to read this fact that one editor must have one account, I have to disclose my connections as well. I will refrain myself from being indulged in sock-puppetting in future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanju Satish Raman (talk • contribs) 09:45, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your posts. Please also read WP:LITTLEBROTHER. You didn't answer my question - I asked for a list of ALL the accounts you have used to edit wikipedia. -- Begoon 09:51, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I used multiple accounts to edit Wikipedia, but only my father's and brother's account. But these accounts Sanju Chunks 2121, Sanju Wiki Editor and Sanju the king are not handled by me, it was misused by some other persons, and I have been blamed for it as I use the same IP address range, which had resulted in problematic consequences. If I may get accused of sock-puppettry or IP socking, I may refrain myself from editing for a period of five months. I wish to be a part of Wikipedia through my original account and enjoy in productive contributions. Sanju Satish Raman (talk) 10:18, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]