User talk:Sanjayr1505

Help me!

{{help me}} Please help me with... Sanjayr1505 (talk) 17:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

facing stash error while creating wikipedia account, can you help me to fix this?

{{help me}} Please help me with... Sanjayr1505 (talk) 17:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you dropped off before we solved this problem on IRC channel #wikipedia-en-help I'm going to try to summarize here what I think happened.

If you keep an editing window open for a very long time, some tokens associated with the connection get timed out, resulting in this error. To get around this problem, you will have to transfer the source text from the edit window to a new edit window and save it there. Note that this is somewhat guesswork, since you haven't explained very well what your circumstances were. How long had you had the edit window open without publishing? Days? — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjay Raina (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jmcgnh were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft reads as overall promotional. Wikipedia articles must be written in a neutral tone.

This draft has external links in the body text, which must be turned into internal links, if a target article exists, or left as plain text.

Much of the body text cites no sources or has irrelevant or faked cites. For instance, ref 2 points to the article for Filmaker magazine with a faked footnote indicator. The article Filmmaker says nothing about Raina.

See also WP:COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sanjayr1505! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Sanjayr1505, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited appears to be an article about yourself. Writing about yourself is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians.

As this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable person to accept articles about them. A page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to or change it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Guidance for article subjects

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking of my Wikipedia account

As I know I have adhere the Wikipedia policy and mistakenly I have use multiple accounts. My intention was not to adhere Wikipedia policy I have mistakenly done that I was very clear I have to make the edit. I will not repeat this thing which I have done earlier and I will adhere all the policy of Wikipedia.

So, request you to unblock my account. Sanjayr1505 (talk) 12:02, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]