User talk:Sanjanind
April 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your recent edits to List of universities in India have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shovon (talk) 06:04, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
AllyD (talk) 21:36, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- Repeatedly adding copyright material is not permissable here. That means no use of copy and paste. AllyD (talk) 21:49, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
-->
December 2012
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Institute of Technical Education & Research (ITER), without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Amartyabag TALK2ME 05:20, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Userpage
[edit]Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is built on mutual trust and respect for each contributors. I have noticed that you have stated in your userpage that you are "a Veteran Editor II, Autopatroller, Reviewer and Rollbacker on English Wikipedia" which I believe to be false. I will request you to refrain from making a false representation about yourself in Wikipedia. You are welcome to make any query in my talk page. Amartyabag TALK2ME 05:38, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
ITER
[edit]Please try to understand Wikipedia has an established set of guidelines for naming an article, please read WP:TITLE. I am pointing out the specific part, "Abbreviations and acronyms are often ambiguous and thus should be avoided unless the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation and that abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject (e.g. NATO, laser, USB). The abbreviation UK, for United Kingdom, is acceptable for use in disambiguation. It is also unnecessary to include an acronym in addition to the name in a title. For more details, see WP:ACRONYMTITLE.". So, you cannot have both the acronym and full name in the article title. Existing famous institutes like, IIM Kolkata, XIMB, IIT Kharagpur, AIIMS which might be popularly called by their acronym, but they have their full article title without acronym. What you can do is create a redirect titled ITER Bhubaneswar to the page. Will that be fine?. For now I am moving it back according to the actual name. Please stop moving the page or you might be blocked from further editing. Regards. Amartyabag TALK2ME 04:11, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- I am completely aware of ITER, but there is a difference between what you perceive to be correct and the existing rule/norms/guidelines. If you are unhappy about the move made by me, you can make a Move request with proper evidence and gain consensus about the title. Please don't forget to sign the talk pages while you comment typing four tildes (~~~~). Thanks. Amartyabag TALK2ME 04:53, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]
|
Orphaned non-free media (File:Regina Cassandra.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Regina Cassandra.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
August 2016
[edit]Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Kabali (film), as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Diff: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
List of highest-grossing Odia films
[edit]Hi there, re: this edit, though your contribution is appreciated, there are two issues:
- It was really ballsy of you to put Odia at the top of the list, when everything else is alphabetized. Very strange choice, particularly when Indian subjects are very prone to ethnic warring. Please exercise more care in the future.
- The entirety of the content was attributed to one random guy's post in a film discussion forum. We do not include user-generated content at Wikipedia. Anybody can print whatever they want on the Internet. We're only interested in what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say about anything. Please familiarize yourself with our guidelines on reliable soruces. Until you can find better sources, the section has been removed. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Disruptive editing at List of highest-grossing Indian films
[edit]I don't understand these edits, specifically the part where you change Baahubali's worldwide gross from 650 crore (which was attributed to this 9 Aug 2016 IBT article) and without any discussion change it to 586.45 based on this 8 October 2015 IBT article, which was written 10 months earlier. This tends to look an awful lot like you're editing to conform the data to a personal opinion you have about Baahubali's performance, and in this specific case, to elevate Bajrangi Bhaijaan above it for whatever reason. Whatever the case, your failure to discuss it beforehand and to instead sneakily change it without proper explanation, is disruptive. Feel free to open a discussion on the article's talk page, but please don't change the value again unless you have consensus to do so. As for the Bajrangi Bhaijaan data, IBT attributes Koimoi as the source of that information, and per WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources, Koimoi is not considered a suitable reference. Similarly, the 8 October 2015 is attributed to Andhra Box Office, a blog, which would also be insufficient per WP:UGC. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Bhaubali conclusion
[edit]Why bhaubali conclusion is named as Telugu and Tamil movie while It's from Telugu industry it should be named as Telugu movie. Why not Kabali is named as Telugu and Tamil then ? Rakesh Irukula (talk) 05:58, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Dangal collections
[edit]Who will add Dangal collections for Taiwan region? Saisiddharth4u (talk) 20:27, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
INRConvert inflation
[edit]Hi there, re: this, I've reverted your changes. The Indian cinema task force seems rather lukewarm about the inclusion of INRConvert templates in articles in general, since many members feel it is arbitrary to convert the figures to US dollars. This discussion seems to indicate a preference to remove INRConvert entirely from the List of highest-grossing Indian films article, which is partly why I reverted the changes. Other discussions at WT:ICTF seem to dislike the clutter created by the adjusted-for-inflation figures. {{INRConvert|230|c|year=2008}} yields: ₹230 crore (equivalent to ₹641 crore or US$77 million in 2023). Just seems like an excessive amount of detail. You're free to open a discussion about it on the article's talk page if you're interested, though. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:27, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Re: this resubmission, please seek consensus for major changes like this. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:21, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Dangal Collections
[edit]You missed Dangal collections for Taiwan region. Dangal collected 35.6 crores gross. It was released in Taiwan in April 2017. Check out Aamir Khan's video message about Taiwan collections. Video was there on web. I still don't understand why you didn't add the Taiwan region collections. Saisiddharth4u (talk) 11:45, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- I assume that this comment was left for me. I have answered your question on my talk page. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:27, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
May 2017
[edit]Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Cyphoidbomb. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Diff: [2] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:35, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at List of highest-grossing Indian films, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Diff: [3] Note that this is a requirement. Failing to do this creates more work for other editors and makes it difficult for bots to archive stale discussions. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:58, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
June 2017
[edit]Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Jab Harry Met Sejal. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Do not remove speedy tags without a proper reason and discussing with other editors. Coderzombie (talk) 04:08, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 7
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC)