User talk:SanityFreeZone

Welcome!

Hello, SanityFreeZone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Robdurbar 08:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion wars

A tag has been placed on Promotion wars, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall ^talk 21:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices, as you did with Promotion wars. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 23:03, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Mark Price (manager)

A tag has been placed on Mark Price (manager) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You are continuing the edit-war that I recently blocked another account for at Urban75, in which the article was repeatedly disrupted with information that is of dubious importance and is uncited by any independent source. I suspect that you're the same person, with a new username. But maybe I'm wrong. If you're the same person, I'll recognize you because you, like him, will keep reverting, and then I'll block you permanently as a sock. If you're a different person, maybe you're a new user who simply didn't realize the importance of reliable sources. If you're a different person, I'll know because you'll read the rules, then stop breaking them. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:49, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You would be wrong... today is the first time, i've edited Urban75...since there is now a page on Mike Slocombe I thought I should recvert back to that.. --SanityFreeZone (talk) 17:06, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jontyjoesph for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. --Pontificalibus (talk) 08:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Offline2 11.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Offline2 11.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:20, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]