User talk:Sangthebirds

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sangthebirds (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What the hell. I only made one joke edit.

Decline reason:

No reason for unblocking given. TN X Man 12:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Sangthebirds (talk) 09:28, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I get blocked for contributing constructively which gets reverted per 'BLP' despite the existence of many sources. Why don't you even read the article and see the sources in that? Are these not good enough sources for your BLP?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sangthebirds (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me because an admin blocked me for editing constructively, see the sources above.

Decline reason:

Fails to address the reason for the block. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:17, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sangthebirds (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block claimed that I was 'not here to edit constructively' without any other justification; this is just one individual passing judgement without as much as a single warning to me that I was 'editing unconstructively'. I made one joke edit to Democratic Republic of the Congo. Aside from that, there is no objective reason why I was blocked and no warning either. The blocking administrator undid my edit to Freedom of speech by country despite the ample existence of sources for the claim as well as an article about the subject which he did not attempt to look for, instead lazily changing it back 'per BLP'.--Sangthebirds (talk) 14:23, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Looking over your edit history, it seems to me you are trying to subtly push a POV, and as for your "joke edit" the rest of us don't share your sense of humor, and aren't looking to do so in the future. This is your third, and last, unblock request, so the page will be protected. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:22, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.