User talk:Sanghvi940940

Nomination of Kanishk Sajnani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kanishk Sajnani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanishk Sajnani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sanghvi940940 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sanghvi6722,GeekBuoy312 & this account are infact owned by a group of friends.We wanted to write an article on our College senior. Being new to the Wikipedia rules & regulations, we had no idea that something like this is not allowed.Although each user used his own email to sing-up it was still considered as sockpuppetery. While we respect the decisions taken by Admins, I request this account, in particular, to be unblocked. Also, to clear tings up- We have never even met Kanishk Sajnani once. We were just impressed by his work & being his College mates; decided to write this up. Also, the user Ayeshna3194 or IP 49.34.152.130 has no connections with us. Sanghvi940940 (talk) 22:57, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One of your college mates is claiming to never have met you. SQL ^{Query me!} 02:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.