User talk:Sangeetha.etpl

August 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Cullen328 (talk) 23:09, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sangeetha.etpl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Soul intention was not create a paid promotion or anything related. Username is set by mistake in confusion with Page name. User name will be changed. Kindly unblock the account Einweit Technologies (talk) 23:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. Please tell us a new username you wish to rename this account to as instructed. Please also describe any connection you have with this company since I assume you didn't pick it at random to edit about. 331dot (talk) 09:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sangeetha.etpl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Sangeetha (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am the admin for the company Einweit Technologies. I wanted to create a nice article about the company and hence I used company email Id and username without knowing that this may violate the Wikipedia norms. The new username will be Sangeetha who is the correct person for this account. Kindly unblock the account Einweit Technologies (talk) 09:34, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please, while here, excise the word "solutions" from your vocabulary unless you are discussing mixtures of chemicals(see WP:SOLUTIONS). That's just marketing puffery. You will need to be familiar with WP:PROMO, WP:COI, and WP:PAID before you are permitted to edit, please review those policies and tell us what will change about your future editing; you'll also likely need to agree to refrain from editing about your company anytime soon. 331dot (talk) 09:50, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the formatting issues with your request, and used the proper template to request a new username for you(please review the block notice carefully in the future). I also placed it at the bottom- please place all edits below other edits, to keep them in order. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply"; the reply feature does not always work well. You may use any email address you wish, that is a separate issue from your username. As you work for the company, the Terms of Use require you to declare as a paid editor. You should also read conflict of interest. Wikipedia is not a database of companies that exist- there is criteria for inclusion, WP:ORG, that must be met, as shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Is there anything you want to write about other than your company? 331dot (talk) 09:41, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I would like to write about the new technology, state of the art solutions etc Einweit Technologies (talk) 09:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about any chemical solutions. A solution is or can never be only a chemical solution. I meant it is about the state of the art methods or proven in use designs in technology to solve some difficult problems. in other words solution to a problem. I can contribute to edit and review based on the facts and references without any intention to promote my or any other company or gain profit as such. Hope you understood my reply. Einweit Technologies (talk) 10:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, "solutions" in this context is just marketing or promotional puffery; at least on this project to write a neutrally worded encyclopedia. Again, please read WP:SOLUTIONS. You may make a new request for someone else to review in which you do as I asked in my decline of your previous request. 331dot (talk) 10:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I see there is no proper change handling in Wikipedia. For instance, the page editor should show some errors related to the article if it doesn't match with the Wikipedia policies before hand. This will save lot of time and avoid mistakes. All in all, Wikipedia editing is complex topic and not user friendly in nature. As someone new to Wikipedia editing will have a very bad experience. I rate the user experience 1 in a band of 1 to 10. Thank you Einweit Technologies (talk) 10:24, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is true that there is a learning curve. It isn't as easy as say, social media, but it isn't meant to be. This is why it is usually recommended that creating a new article not be the first thing that people do, they should first edit existing articles, to understand how Wikipedia works and what is expected of article content. Using the new user tutorial is a good idea, too. But how people choose to participate is up to them. The "user experience" is important, but our main goal is to write an encyclopedia, not just make it easy to edit(which would result in its own problems)

Unfortunately it's not possible to just program the page editor with policies so that improper edits are prevented that way. There is too much nuance and interpretation involved for some automatic process like that. The best way is simply to learn by doing. 331dot (talk) 10:29, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else will review your request, but they will have a hard time believing that you reviewed and understand the relevant policies in the last few minutes. You need to demonstrate that you understand, not just tell us that you do. 331dot (talk) 10:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there are facts, evidences and references to any topic then it is nothing else but true. Anyways, I have agreed to go through the policies before publishing on Wikipedia in future. So what's the big deal in not accepting such claims. Einweit Technologies (talk) 10:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We have many editors who say that they understand our policies, and then once unblocked go right back to doing the same thing wrong, which wastes everyone's time(including the editor). We need you to demonstrate your understanding. 331dot (talk) 10:55, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have understood the following WP so far.

Neutral Point of View (NPOV): Articles must present information fairly and without bias, representing all significant viewpoints accurately.
Verifiability: All content must be backed by reliable sources that can be checked. Unsourced material may be removed.No Original Research: Wikipedia is not a platform for publishing original ideas or research. Information must be previously published by a credible source.
Citing Sources: Proper citations are required to support statements. Reliable sources include books, scholarly articles, reputable news outlets, and other well-established publications.
Notability: Subjects of articles should be notable, meaning they have received significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject.
Avoid Promotional Content: Articles should not serve as advertisements. Content should be informative and not promotional.
Respect for Others: Engage respectfully with other editors, avoid edit wars, and follow the dispute resolution process for conflicts.
Neutral Language: Avoid words that imply judgment, bias, or opinion. Stick to factual descriptions and avoid loaded terms or promotional language.
Clarity and Simplicity: Use clear, simple language that can be easily understood by a general audience. Avoid jargon, technical terms, or complex language unless necessary, and provide explanations or links to definitions when used.
Conciseness: Be concise. Avoid unnecessary words or overly detailed descriptions that do not contribute to the reader's understanding of the topic.
Formal Tone: Maintain a formal, encyclopedic tone. Avoid slang, colloquialisms, or conversational language.
Consistency: Use consistent terminology throughout the article. For example, if you choose to use "U.S." instead of "United States," stick to that choice throughout the article.
Gender-Neutral Language: Use gender-neutral language where possible, such as "they" instead of "he or she," unless the subject specifically requires gendered language.
Avoid First-Person Language: Write in the third person. Avoid using "I," "we," or "you" in the text, as Wikipedia articles are not personal essays.

And some other. Einweit Technologies (talk) 11:03, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sangeetha.etpl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have gone through Wikipedia policies and In my future editing I will carefully read all the relevant Wikipedia policies and publish my page. Also, I agree to refrain from editing about my company anytime soon.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 09:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sangeetha.etpl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary because I have understood that the block is due to advertising or promotion (WP:Spam), purpose of Wikipedia (WP: Purpose of Wikipedia), and username representing an organization (WP: username policy). These are violation of Wikipedia policies. I confirm that I will not write anything on Wikipedia for the purpose of advertising or promotion. I confirm that I will not write anything on Wikipedia that violates the purpose of Wikipedia policy. I will confirm that the username will be changed after the unblock. I confirm that the following policies are read and understood.

Citing Sources: Proper citations are required to support statements. Reliable sources include books, scholarly articles, reputable news outlets, and other well-established publications.
Notability: Subjects of articles should be notable, meaning they have received significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject.
Avoid Promotional Content: Articles should not serve as advertisements. Content should be informative and not promotional.
Respect for Others: Engage respectfully with other editors, avoid edit wars, and follow the dispute resolution process for conflicts.
Neutral Language: Avoid words that imply judgment, bias, or opinion. Stick to factual descriptions and avoid loaded terms or promotional language.
Clarity and Simplicity: Use clear, simple language that can be easily understood by a general audience. Avoid jargon, technical terms, or complex language unless necessary, and provide explanations or links to definitions when used.
Conciseness: Be concise. Avoid unnecessary words or overly detailed descriptions that do not contribute to the reader's understanding of the topic.
Formal Tone: Maintain a formal, encyclopedic tone. Avoid slang, colloquialisms, or conversational language.
Consistency: Use consistent terminology throughout the article. For example, if you choose to use "U.S." instead of "United States," stick to that choice throughout the article.
Gender-Neutral Language: Use gender-neutral language where possible, such as "they" instead of "he or she," unless the subject specifically requires gendered language.
Avoid First-Person Language: Write in the third person. Avoid using "I," "we," or "you" in the text, as Wikipedia articles are not personal essays.

I confirm that I will contribute to Wikipedia considering the purpose of Wikipedia.

I confirm that I will not cause damage or disruption to Wikipedia..

Decline reason:

You seem to understand the reason for the block. However, you have not said whether you will make a WP:PAID declaration or not. Also, you don't say what topics you want to edit, if unblocked. Lastly, you haven't proposed a new username. PhilKnight (talk) 18:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sangeetha.etpl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

WP: PAID, I confirm that I am not a paid contributer or did not get any benefit or gain from an entity or organization to edit the Wikipedia.

I will edit on Software Engineering topics as I possess relevant qualification and industry experience for the same

New username will be "sangeetha.etpl"

Decline reason:

duplicate request

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Question. If you're claiming not to have any connection to the company, what does the "etpl" at the end of your proposed username stand for? —C.Fred (talk) 21:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sangeetha.etpl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

etpl is a personal short initials, nothing to do with any sort of recognition or trademark. As I said etpl is something very personal and if I reveal that then I am breaching data privacy for personal information If WP has any issue with that then alternatives suggestion 'sangeetha2024'

I hope this will not have any issue

Decline reason:

You obviously do not understand our policies about paid editing. -- asilvering (talk) 21:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've carried out the rename. Can you clarify whether you used generative AI to help with writing any of your previous unblock requests? Elli (talk | contribs) 05:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also note you falsely claim you are not a paid editor. You've previously noted that you are indeed a paid editor (that is, you are employed by the company). Please (1) remove one of your open unblock requests, and (2) remove the false claim that you are not a paid editor. You can have only one open unblock request at a time, so absolutely do not make a third simultaneous open unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 11:34, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you also understand why it might be difficult for us to think that "etpl" is something other than "Einweit Technologies Private Limited"? 331dot (talk) 11:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, how many times should I tell you that etpl is something personal.

e- eshwara

t- tamil nadu

p- parivarika

l- lekhaka

Secondly, I am not a paid editor. I am the owner of that entity. I am not employed by the company, I run the company. 2003:C6:F71A:9176:5D35:122D:B1BD:507D (talk) 12:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

THAT MAKES YOU A PAID EDITOR. --Yamla (talk) 12:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't operate the company for free, you do so to earn a living. 331dot (talk) 17:54, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I would like to withdraw my claim to not a paid editor. 2003:C6:F71A:9180:5D35:122D:B1BD:507D (talk) 06:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sangeetha.etpl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have gone through Wikipedia policies and In my future editing I will carefully read all the relevant Wikipedia policies and publish my page.

Decline reason:

This platitude is not convincing at all. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:30, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WP:BLANKING

If this was you, note that you are not permitted to edit or remove declined unblock requests. Additionally, you need to sign in to your account. --Yamla (talk) 20:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]