User talk:Sangamcse

Welcome!

Hello, Sangamcse, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Template:National Institutes of Technology, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 13:24, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, I'm Muhandes. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to National Institute of Technology Sikkim have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 13:27, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in National Institute of Technology Sikkim, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note WP:INDICSCRIPT. Muhandes (talk) 13:54, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As a general hint, if someone else removes content, check the edit summary. The reason will be listed there, in this case WP:INDICSCRIPT. --Muhandes (talk) 13:56, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Sangamcse. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article National Institute of Technology Sikkim, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 14:16, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read this text. Is avoid editing not understood? --Muhandes (talk) 15:07, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at National Institute of Technology Sikkim. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 14:37, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at National Institute of Technology Sikkim shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Muhandes (talk) 15:08, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at National Institute of Technology Sikkim, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please stop introducing Indic Scripts againt policy as you did three times already [1] [2] [3]. Muhandes (talk) 15:12, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also note MOS:DOCTOR disallows degrees, please remove those. --Muhandes (talk) 15:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. Kindly check NIT Trichy as this page is same as NIT Sikkim. sangamcse 16:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

I handled WP:INDICSCRIPT and MOS:DOCTOR issues, if you see other things that need editing feel free to mention them. Please note that as someone with a COI you should probably be very careful with edits of competing NITs as well. --Muhandes (talk) 17:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to National Institute of Technology Sikkim, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 16:51, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sangamcse, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sangamcse! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at National Institute of Technology Sikkim. I warned you numerous times about editing National Institute of Technology Sikkim to which you have a WP:COI as a student. If you don't stop editing it, you will be blocked. Muhandes (talk) 19:12, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sangamcse (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abelmoschus Esculentus was:

This is your own Wikipedia user page, not suitable for mainspace (not an article).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sangamcse/sandbox/Sangamcse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Sangamcse/sandbox/Sangamcse, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~AE (talk • contributions) 06:26, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Hi, I declined your recent AfC submission (see above notice) just now. It seems to be your user page, not suitable for an independent article. The original submission place is User:Sangamcse/sandbox/Sangamcse, so I moved it to User:Sangamcse. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on User talk:Abelmoschus Esculentus, WP:Teahouse or WP:Help desk. Regards ~AE (talk • contributions) 06:31, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]