User talk:Sandym651

Welcome!

Hello, Sandym651, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Troll 4, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Derild 49 21 ☼ 23:58, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Troll 4

The article Troll 4 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Violates WP:CRYSTAL. Too far into the future.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Derild 49 21 ☼ 23:58, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Troll 3

Hi, could you please use the preview button before submitting your edits. It helps to prevent mistakes. JV Smithy (talk) 00:42, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dancing Dwarfs

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Dancing Dwarfs, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tryptofish (talk) 22:14, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Joe Mauer worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Wolfnix • Talk • 03:36, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Troll 4, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DGG ( talk ) 18:31, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please Stop Vandalizing the Troll Articles

Hi there Sandym651. Please stop vandalizing Wikipedia. Wikipedia needs more film article editors, so we would really appreciate if you would contribute in the capacity of adding referenced facts and expanding articles with true information. I get that your Troll film contributions are supposed to be funny, but Wikipedia's not the place for that. Cracked.com pays $50 for funny articles, so use your humor over there, and make some cash at it. And contribute here by adding facts. Thanks! GreenGlass^(talk) 05:18, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No need to be so angry...

In regards this note Ron Ritzman was not acting out of any animus or hatred, and was simply responding to the opinions of other editors as offered in the deletion discussion. If it were not him, it might have been anyone. HOWEVER... you might always request the page be placed in a user sub-page, such as User:Sandym651/workpage/Troll 4 where you can work on it and try to bring it into line with Wikipedia's notability requirements for film articles... which you can read at WP:Notability (films). Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:28, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shyamalan Twist

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Shyamalan Twist, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RJaguar3 | u | t 15:19, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shyamalan Twist for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Shyamalan Twist, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shyamalan Twist until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SummerPhD (talk) 02:36, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

Based on several recent edits[1][2], you seem to be unaware of Wikipedia's conventions on capitalization. Before making changes of this sort again, please review our Manual of style, particularly the section on article titles, headings and sections. Were it not for the fact that the article is about to be deleted, the article Shyamalan Twist should be renamed "Shyamalan twist". Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 13:24, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

That you've ignored all attempts to contact you and continue your unconstructive editing is not a problem. You'll probably leave as soon as Shyamalan Twist is deleted. - SummerPhD (talk) 04:03, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Shyamalan Twist, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:02, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:03, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Attacking Others

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. -WarthogDemon 23:31, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Account blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:47, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]