User talk:Sandstunk
Welcome
[edit]
|
FYI. --illythr (talk) 14:57, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
April 2013
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.(✉→BWilkins←✎) 15:31, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Sandstunk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What's this block for?? I am not impersonating anyone. Check and convince yourself! All my edits were in accordance with CIA factbooks, and of course the User : Illythr was against. Sandstunk (talk) 15:38, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As mentioned, the similarity of your username to Sandstein's, modified by an unflattering descriptor, is inappropriate. If you wish to continue editing, you need to request a change in username; I'd suggest carefully reading WP:NPOV and WP:RGW first, too. The Bushranger One ping only 18:04, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your account name is very close to User:Sandstein. Daniel Case (talk) 15:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
I would like to create the account Sand1812 and to be unblocked.
- I would never be averse to unblocking. However, your name - and subjects being edited - were quite obviously done as a reaction to clearly appropriate warnings and deletions by User:Sandstein. As such, your "beginning" so far has all the signs of battleground behaviour - even your userpage shows this. That type of behaviour is not nor ever shall be appropriate. I would encourage you to discuss how you intend to move forward without such battleground as a part of any unblock request. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 19:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)