Jump to content

User talk:Sandstein/Archives/2020/September

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Closure

Can I ask why you closed this as no consensus? The votes were 3-1 in favor of keeping, and the delete arguments were proven to be totally unfounded, with plenty of references found, including countless scores of newspaper sources, as I mentioned, from the newspapers.com database. I understand 'no consensus' is effectively 'keep', but I think it is important for its record, and for future AfD-eager editors to see. ɱ (talk) 22:16, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Ɱ, it's 3-2 including the nomination. And notability isn't something you can prove or disprove, it's a matter of editorial judgment and the assessment of sources, about which people often have different opinions in good faith. Both sides made valid arguments in this case, and so we have no consensus both numerically and in terms of strength of argument. Sandstein 09:04, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The nominator didn't vote, so technically the vote tally is 3-1. Notability is something established through the presence or absence of reliable sources, that also determines whether an article should stay or be deleted. The deletionists had no valid arguments, simply stating they didn't see enough sources. It appears they didn't look very hard, e.g. checking Newspapers.com. I provided the evidence of significant sources that really washed away their single argument. Please explain to me what "valid arguments" were provided by that side? ɱ (talk) 14:03, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Ɱ, in an AfD, there are no votes because it is a discussion, not a vote. But by definition whoever requests a deletion discussion wants the article to be deleted. That is our longstanding practice in closing AfDs. As to the arguments, there were disagreements about whether multiple sources should count as one, or are merely local; this is not for me to decide. Sandstein 14:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
That was a petty discussion the nominator fought against an editor providing multiple sources, that wasn't a valid reason for deletion. Again, that minor point of single vs. multiple is irrelevant when I found large lists of sources. ɱ (talk) 14:09, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
As well, the argument of there only having been Cincinnati sources and whether or not that counts as local or regional was shown to be irrelevant with me providing news sources from multiple areas and states. ɱ (talk) 14:10, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Ɱ, that may well be so, but you failed to convince enough other editors of it. I think I have explained my closure adequately and will not reply further. Sandstein 14:56, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Meh, people don't admit to their mistakes, people don't admit they were wrong. The evidence was clearly in favor of keep, and you know it. ɱ (talk) 15:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Ɱ, same here, Sandstein are a biased admin i have ever seen. His decision are very wrong and also include bias. Sandstein you know your dark mind :) . −136.228.175.133 (talk) 11:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Shame

Hay, Sandstein come here, you are a biased admin i have ever seen. You are not eligible for admin-ship. How did you became an admin of Wikipedia? I've been watching you for a long time. You are biasing on some AfD. Some afd are clearly kept (have 6 keep and 2 delete) but you don't close early never and then relisted & wait again again for delete votes. So what is your ptoblem? What you want? you want to delete articles? You know your mind!! :) It's not fair. So shame on you admin. This is not an attack but my criticise on you. 136.228.175.133 (talk) 11:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

If you disagree with any of my AfD closures, you can appeal them at WP:DRV. Sandstein 14:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
No, it is not i means!! You know your mistakes! Some of your decision is very nefarious. 136.228.172.178 (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
"Very nefarious"... I like the sound of that. All beware the very nefarious admin! Sandstein 15:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
I disagree with you! In my opinion Mr. Sandstein is one of the best Admins, I learned a lot of things from him, he always help newcomers and encourage good contributions to Wikipedia, he doesn't encourage deleting the articles, in the other way, He encourage writing good articles according to Wikipedia notability guidelines. if you have problem in satisfying these guidelines, think about (writing a draft) and improving it a long the time (if the article topic is interesting and could be notable). if not just write about another topic. Charmk (talk) 19:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
agree with you same here, Why is it so delay to close Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Maria-Olympia of Greece and Denmark (2nd nomination) ? The bias is obvious. It's very disgusting. Sandstein so what is your problem? Are you waiting for more delete votes? This afd has been relisting for 10 days. 136.228.175.12 (talk) 06:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
136.228.175.12, you falsified your signature. Do not do this again or you may be blocked. As to your question, I relisted the AfD because at that time consensus was unclear. After another seven days have elapsed, an admin (not necessarily me) will re-assess consensus and close the AfD. It may take longer because there is currently a backlog at AfD. Sandstein 06:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. I understand sorry for rude. Cheers 07:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.228.175.12 (talk)

Discussion at Cinemagraph § Cinemagraph with repeating human action

 You are invited to join the discussion at Cinemagraph § Cinemagraph with repeating human action. cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 10:58, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Mariolovr

I haven't yet looked to see if Mariolovr is RockingGeo. But RockingGeo is the first person who came to my mind after seeing Mariolovr at the Murder article and then following his contributions. I gave Mariolovr a chance to come clean on his talk page about not being new. So if he denies having had a previous Wikipedia account or explains his obvious editing experience away in some other manner, I will have to drop the matter until I have evidence regarding just what past account(s) he used. I'm making you aware of this because you had issues with RockingGeo in the past and may be able to recognize him. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 17:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Help for closing duplicate AfD

Wondering if you can remove one of these or close the second one? I saw that you are online today.
First: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 FA Summer Tournament
Second Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 FA Summer Tournament (2nd nomination)

I messaged giant Snowman but I do not think he is active at the moment and I am unsure what to do with this dup. Lightburst (talk) 15:53, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Lightburst, I procedurally closed the second one. Sandstein 15:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Closing discussion 2020 American athlete boycotts or strikes

Hello again, messaging you because you are active. Can you tell me the right place to go to request a closure of this move discussion? The article just got promoted at DYK and the discussion began August 28. Discussion Lightburst (talk) 16:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Lightburst, please provide a link. Sandstein 17:10, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
link to discussion Lightburst (talk) 17:22, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Lightburst, see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure. Sandstein 17:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks I see it was closed already...good! Thanks! Lightburst (talk) 23:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Never Hillary

You deleted the never hillary article. [1] . Can you please userfy it for me. Thank you

BlackAmerican (talk) 14:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

BlackAmerican, sorry, I don't undelete articles. But you can ask at WP:REFUND. Sandstein 15:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Checkmarx

Unsalt, please?—S Marshall T/C 16:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

S Marshall, done. Sandstein 16:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you.—S Marshall T/C 16:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Article for deletion/Vehicular violence in the United States

Thank you for re-listing this discussion. I would value your advice. This article was viewed about thirty times daily until the person listing it for deletion eliminated internal links from more than twenty Wikipedia articles formerly containing links to the article proposed for deletion. Page views have dropped to about five per day following the edits eliminating those links. I am reluctant to mention this history in the discussion because it might be perceived as personal criticism, and I do not wish to engage in an edit war, but I am concerned the article may be regarded as an orphan without those internal links. The reduced number of page views may be contributing to the limited number of discussion participants. Thewellman (talk) 20:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Thewellman, please provide a link. Sandstein 15:54, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vehicular violence in the United States and here are the formerly linked articles:

Thewellman (talk) 23:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Thewellman, the amount of links or traffic an article has is normally not relevant at AfD, so I don't really see how it might influence the discussion either way. If the article is kept, you are free to restore these links. Sandstein 15:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
The links were removed from the aforementioned articles because they either had nothing to do with the subject at hand or were already covered by existing articles that are more appropriate for the subject at had, e.g. vehicle-ramming attack. For example (in regards to the former), I don't see how a car bomb would be considered an act of "vehicular violence", especially if the car wasn't the weapon in the first place. Love of Corey (talk) 04:04, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Time to close AFD

I think that it's time to close the Dasha Nekrasova AFD. Davidgoodheart (talk) 18:36, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Davidgoodheart, none is open. Sandstein 20:05, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Disagree with Afd verdict for Winkle Islands

The island doesn't merit an article, per WP:GEOLAND. (I guess I should have made this argument in the Afd.) At best, Winkle Island, County Antrim could be a redirect to The Skerries, plus there's nothing worth merging that isn't already there. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Clarityfiend, yes, you should have made this argument in the AfD. Sandstein 06:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Assistance with noticeboard dispute

Hello, may you please assist in solving this event which is continuing to flare up? - TheLionHasSeen (talk) 19:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, please disregard. - TheLionHasSeen (talk) 20:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Yoni Assia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoni Assia (3rd nomination) - Now Yoni Assia is in 40 Under 40 of Fortune [2] i think we should rethinking about bring the article back. אור פ (talk) 14:03, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

אור פ, I have no opinion about that. Sandstein 15:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
so where to appel? אור פ (talk) 20:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
אור פ, you can recreate the article, but if it is not substantially improved it may quickly be deleted again. Sandstein 21:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Folly on my part

Hello... An error has occurred on my part regarding the withdrawal of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina Karella. I closed the discussion as keep even though it had two deletion !votes. It isn't that I'm unaware of the Afd policy which states that discussions where del votes have been cast should run their course even if the nom wishes to withdraw. It's just that yesterday I was a bit frazzled as it is due matters on the personal front and it slipped my mind completely. It was a genuine folly of human endeavour for which I am regretful. A few hours ago one of the !voters who voted for deletion conveyed to me their intent to change their vote to Keep. Would you be kind enough as to glance over to the related discussion on my talk page and tell me how we should proceed with this. Thank you. TheRedDomitor (talk) 11:19, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your edits on the Breonna Taylor page

It looked like a full-blown edit war was about to occur, thanks for your intervention. GreenFrogsGoRibbit (talk) 10:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

GreenFrogsGoRibbit, didn't even see that, but thanks. Sandstein 10:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

BADNAC

Sorry to bother you. you just relisted this AfD and it looks like perhaps we have a BADNAC. Nominator closed. See discussion that was on my talk page. Here. I closed the template and signed for the closer so someone may have assumed I closed. Lightburst (talk) 15:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

I've undone the close, which was done by the nominator. --Finngall talk 15:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/onemanonewoman 4th nomination

You beat me to it, and I'm glad of it because you wrote it up very nicely. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:26, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Time to close AFD

I think it's time to close the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unsolved deaths (before 1900) AFD as it has been listed for seven days. Nobody has voted to keep it. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Davidgoodheart, an administrator will attend to it in time. There are many other AfDs that need closing by admins at WP:OAFD. Sandstein 20:50, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The result of the AFD was to merge to the List of unsolved deaths. You will see that (right here: List of unsolved deaths (before 1900)) there is now a notice above the article that was added on September 24 that says "If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use the destination article's talk page", yet no action has yet taken place. Davidgoodheart (talk) 07:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

AfD "closed by consensus"

Hey Sandstein. Sorry to involve you but I thought you were one of the best go-to admins in this situation. The article creator at [[3]] has suggested that they will move my nomination into Draftspace until later notice. Is closing this nomination on these grounds something you can do? Or do I have to go through a formal process? Thanks x doktorb wordsdeeds 22:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Doktorbuk, sorry for the long delay. As long as all interested editors agree, there is no problem in draftifying the article, which has already been done. I have accordingly closed the AfD. Sandstein 20:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

BookBlast Deletion

Hello Sandstein

Sorry for my previous long post there are many topics to do with one company.I didn't realise that they came under several administrators. I will be as brief as I can be in covering all the points

User:Theroadislong : Non notable writing agency with zero independent in-depth sources

The original draft was submitted for review by an experienced Wiki editor as per instructions and approved in January 2016

BookBlast writing agency meets the Wikipedia notability Guidelines in the following ways:

Manages 2 notable literary estates which meet wikipedia notability Guidelines

Lesley Blanch Author/Historian/Traveller Awarded MBE 2001 Awarded medal of Officier de l'Ordre des Arts, French Government 2004 A Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature

Her archive is housed at The Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library, Yale University Lesley Blanch archive

New College Library, Oxford PDF of catalogued items available and have acknowledgement emails and Agreement letter with Head Librarian and Archivist

Interview with Georgia de Chamberet about Lesley Blanch for Radio France Culture 22 May 2008 Bookblast Lesyley Blanch

The Guardian 24 January 2017. by Georgia de Chamberet Lesley Blanch never apologised for who she was

George Elton Mayo psychologist/industrial researcher/organizational theorist Known in particular for The Hawthorne Studies

The Baker Library, Harvard Business School [4]

The Economist ‘Guru Elton Mayo’ 24 April 2009 [5]

Australian Dictionary of Biography, Volume 10, (MUP), 1986 ‘Mayo, George Elton (1880–1949) by Helen Bourke’ by Helen Bourke

Other Notable References

Bookblast was selected by the curators of Bodleian Electronic Archives & Manuscripts, Bodleian Libraries, Oxford, in March 2015, as being of lasting research value & worthy of permanent preservation in the Web Archive of the Bodleian Libraries. https://archive-it.org/home/bodleian?q=bookblast.com Bodleian Library


XCiTés: The Flamingo Book of New French Writing anthology featured writing by 15 writers under 40 who were unpublished in English when published in 1999 (also deleted in April 2020 by User:Theroadislong)

The Independent ‘No brie, but lots of ecstasy’ by Helen Stevenson 14 July 1999 https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/wednesday-book-no-brie-but-lots-of-ecstasy-1106265.html

Gallix, Andrew (12 September 2008). ‘The New Wave of French Urban Fiction, The Guardian Books’. Andrew Gallix. Retrieved 2020-04-13. [6]

Cowley, Jason (5 June 2002 New Statesman). ‘France: into the void’. Jason Cowley June 2002 New Statesman

Empire Windrush: 50 Years of Writing About Black Britain (Victor Gollancz, 1998) Agented by Bookblast, the first anthology to gather together a group of writers telling the stories encapsulating the Windrush generation. Of relevance in the UK, USA and any European country with a colonial past. Cases are being processed in the House of Lords at the moment.

The Spectator ‘Hot writing in a cold climate’ by Tony Gould 23 May 1998 [7]


ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC) Delete NCORP fail. Appears to be a promotional effort as well.

I don't know what NCORP is. Does failing NCORP lead to immediate deletion? As to the promotional remark, can ThatMontrealIP be more specific

The Bookblast entry is subject and topic driven, there are no vanity pieces promoting Bookblast

Theroadislong (talk) 11:26, 24 April 2020 (UTC) Also undeclared paid editing.

A COI was posted to my talk page informing me that information had to be provided, I didn't see it until long after BookBlast was deleted.

Sandstein:Please can you intervene and ask Theroadislong to supply reliable and verifiable information that I was paid to edit 4 years ago. It seems to go against Wikipedia's guidelines about casting aspersions

"An editor must not accuse another of misbehavior without evidence, especially when the accusations are repeated or severe. This especially applies to accusations of being paid by a company to promote a point of view (i.e., a shill) or similar associations and using that to attack or cast doubt over the editor in content disputes." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Casting_aspersions

These unproven allegations damage Bookblast and the founder MSs De Chamberet. especially since it has been engineered so that this and other accusations are now in the public domain.

This deletion happened over a period of a week 24/04/2020-01/05/2020 with no time given to modify the article, or to supply supporting references. Considering the country was in the middle of a pandemic, with some parts suffering more than others, it seems a little insensitive.

Lots of catch all and nebulous comments placed on my talk page by Theroadislong none are specific or point to a specific area of concern.

Knight2kb3 (talk) 20:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Knight2kb3, this is WP:TLDR. Sandstein 21:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Ring_(programming_language) article protection

The editors pinged below are invited to discuss this somewhere other than on my talk page. Sandstein
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Hello Mr. Sandstein

Could you remove the Ring_(programming_language) page protection

References (Secondary Resources)

  1. ^ Paul Krill (24 August 2020). "Ring language upgrade focuses on WebAssembly". InfoWorld.
  2. ^ Bernhard Lauer (14 August 2018). "Ring: flexible, simple, fast". Dotnetpro.
  3. ^ Ahmed Mohammed Hassan. "Ring: A programming language developed by Arab". muslims-res.com. Retrieved 2020-09-28.
  4. ^ Ciklum (12 December 2017). "New Programming Languages – A Hype Or Reality?". ciklum.com. Ciklum.

Charmk (talk) 22:56, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Charmk, not interested, sorry. This is something like the fourth request of that kind. I have no more time for this topic. Sandstein 18:31, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Sandstein Yes it's the third time, Thank you very much for your valuable feedback in the previous two times. I am sorry that I talked to you many times, it's the protocol when an administrator protect an article, the protocol is to talk to him first before submitting a general request. I hope other editors (Chalst, Kvng, Pavlor, AmericanAir88, Widefox, 94rain, Dgpop, Andy_Dingley, KylieTastic, Rosguill) with experience in deletion discussions about programming languages would review the draft. Thanks to everyone Charmk (talk) 14:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks & Sorry

Dear Mr. Sandstein Thanks for your time & help. Also I am sorry if I wasted some of your time with topics that you are not interested in. God bless you Charmk (talk) 16:06, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

BookBlast Deletion

Apologies again,I'm new to this. Please could you give your opinion on notability, I'll sort out the other issues. Knight2kb3 (talk) 17:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Knight2kb3, please link to the article at issue. Sandstein 18:06, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sandstein/Archives/2020/September&oldid=1045701495"