User talk:Sandman arabone
This is Sandman arabone's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Welcome!
Hello, Sandman arabone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome!
– Fayenatic London 08:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 8)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sandman arabone/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Sandman arabone,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:46, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
|
Regarding your edits to Orpheus
[edit]The sources you cited do not meet WP:Identifying reliable sources. In some cases, you simply cited other Wikipedia articles, which not allowed per WP:REFLOOP. The blog you cited falls under WP:USERG.
There's also the problem of undue weight and original research. You really need secondary or tertiary sources to establish that those theories are given any widespread attention. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:28, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- I see that you've been making the same sort of edits to other articles. Always cite a professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic source for any new information. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:32, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Churrio Jabal has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Joseph2302 21:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC)