User talk:Sandlaeors

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sandlaeors (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As it is not myself causing the vandalism, it is other people using the same IP adress at my school.

Decline reason:

This is a sockpuppetry block that I presume was done in good faith. If other people are actually using your account, then it has been compromised and will be left blocked. You can always create a new one ... there aren't that many edits on this one. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:54, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A tag has been placed on Cristiano Novembre, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Cristiano Novembre is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Cristiano Novembre saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Matthew_hk t c 12:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:McSaucePaste. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bonadea (talk) 10:50, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Cristiano novembre

A tag has been placed on Cristiano novembre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 18:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further to your message on my talk page, I did not delete the article, I just tagged it for deletion because when I saw it it was nearly blank. From the deletion log, it appears it was deleted for the third time by Nancy because it had been re-created despite a discussion that concluded it should be deleted. Since it has been deleted three times I consider it unlikely that admins would want it re-created, but if you ask an administrator like Nancy they may give you a copy of the text to work on. You will have to show that Cristiano Novembre is notable. It seems to me that a reserve goalkeeper with no first-team appearances is unlikely to be sufficiently notable: that's why the article has been deleted three times. regards, TrulyBlue (talk) 18:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]