User talk:Sandford012

I'm sorry but I disagree. The new table was designed to avoid the pitfalls of the old one and only include more important features. If anything it could have been shorter. There was a discussion here (with VQuakr) and the table has stayed since. Why don't you act constructively and work to improve the table rather than just deleting other users edits. We could sit here all day reverting edits. This would be a pointless editwar. Please try to be constructive. I'll leave it for now so you can put up an improved version of the table. Please feel free to include any vendors you think are notable. If you don't want to be constructive I'll try to put up a more refined version in a few days. I'd appreciate it if you didn't just remove my edits rather than trying to fix them.

BTW: I didn't mention this in the main discussion page but pretty much all of your edits are destructive. You've previously modified most of the vendors of PC Power Management software. Are you sure you don't have a conflict of interest?Projectjennifer (talk) 14:01, 9 May 2011 (UTC)