User talk:Sanderadio
Always open to suggestions or remarks!
KuifjeNL
February 2012
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article I Want You (Marvin Gaye album), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 00:26, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Glienicke Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bridge of Spies. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
RE: I Want You (Marvin Gaye album)
[edit]Hi. I've removed that entire section, since none of the sources were reliable. Geowayne.com is a self-published source positing personal analysis/interpretation of songs by someone named Wayne Studer. The Wikipedia article on I Get Along (Pet Shop Boys song) is not a reliable source (WP:NOTSOURCE). I could not find anything online (Google, GoogleBooks, etc.) stating the Pet Shop Boys sampled or used "I Want You". Please keep in mind that an encyclopedia is not just a space for facts and ideas, but a space for notable facts and ideas. If something is not said by a reliable third-party source, then it simply won't be included, regardless of whether it's factual or not. Dan56 (talk) 20:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- AllMusic is the source for the release date, as shown here in the article, where there is a footnote placed alongside the material in question. The Internet isn't your only source for information. There are books, journals, magazines, liner notes, etc. and if one of those sources explicitly says what you want to have an article say, please feel free to include it with the appropriate citation. I'm not going to get too in-depth and explain the gist and logistics of Wikipedia; there's a more-than-adequate guideline here on identifying different kinds of sources for reliability, along with this essay which explains the purpose of articles in one sentence: "Wikipedia's articles are intended as intelligent summaries and reflections of current published debate within the relevant fields, an overview of the relevant literature." Dan56 (talk) 20:46, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)