User talk:Sanchoco

April 2016

Hello, I'm 7Sidz. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Michelle Thomas— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 7Sidz (talk) 03:46, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the discussions on the article's talk page. We have probably been through this before. If you have additional information or do not agree, please add to the discussion there. Thanks. - SummerPhD^v2.0 04:37, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sanchoco (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know why I was blocked from editing by Doug Weller, the reason for the block was not given and the editing I have done has been minimal and not disrupting the information that were in said pages. I only found out about this because I was going to correct a grammatical error(a letter) on Mike Fiers page

Decline reason:

Account is not blocked. If you provide us the message you get when you try to edit, we may be able to help. SQL ^{Query me!} 02:15, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This account is not blocked - please tell us the message you get when you try to edit. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:07, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]