User talk:Samywamy10

I have fixed below

Fair use rationale for Image:Hobbies.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hobbies.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 13:45, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hobbies.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hobbies.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feb 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Jagex. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. rdunn PLIB 12:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of pharaohs, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of pharaohs was changed by Samywamy10 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-08-31T23:51:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of War of Legends

The article War of Legends has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can find about nothing on Google News, and the article itself syas that "no more information is known" about the subject. It therefore fails WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tim Song (talk) 07:03, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of War of Legends

I have nominated War of Legends, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/War of Legends. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

While I have no real interest in its outcome, the article's notability is in question. You need to provide secondary sources to show that it deserves an article here. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 12:31, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Cain II ‎, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 10:12, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to John Cain II. Crazynas^t 10:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]