User talk:Samurai Cerberus

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Samurai Cerberus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Crossmr (talk) 20:14, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help Me

{{helpme}} 1) am I supposed to watch pages that I like or ones that I can help with?

2) I don't know how to get my boxes in order, can someone help? Samurai Cerberus (talk) 17:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!

You can use your watchlist to check up on any pages want to keep up to date on. Each user uses his or her differently. Many watch pages they have edited or created. For more information see Help:Watching pages.
I'm not sure what you mean by getting your userboxes in order? There are several ways to arrange userboxes, many of which can be found here.

Hope this helped! If you need further help with these issues or have any other questions, please feel free to leave a message here or on my talk page. Happy editing! --omtay 38 18:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Samurai Cerberus (talk) 18:47, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cuteness

I've replied here. Dorftrottel (warn) 10:50, April 28, 2008

Thanks Samurai Cerberus (talk) 11:24, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied again. Dorftrottel (canvass) 12:57, April 28, 2008

I am watching cute allready. Samurai Cerberus (talk) 13:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Texas, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RC-0722 ^247.5/1 00:42, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I thought I was fixing vandalism. Samurai Cerberus (talk) 00:44, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK. RC-0722 ^247.5/1 00:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK

Sorry to ask for help, but there is somthing strange in my Boxes.

While Im at it, is the Edit summary a big deal? Samurai Cerberus (talk) 23:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Which boxes are strange, and where?

Re. Edit summary - yes, it's very important, because all changes to all pages are tracked, forever. this makes it easy to look back, to find out when something changed and why. It's not so important on your own user pages, but anything in mainspace - it's vital to put in a meaningful note of what you did and why. -- Chzz ► 00:01, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thare is a big box above the "This user is on a diet" box saying my page is going to be dleated. Samurai Cerberus (talk)

OK, I'm looking at that now... -- Chzz ► 00:24, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah - I guess you figured it out yourself? It was the {{User:UBX/diet}} that was causing the problems.

Cheers! -- Chzz ► 00:30, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Thanks for your message, that I just saw, letting me know. I'm sorry I was a bit slow fixing it, as my internet went down part-way through.

For more info about 'edit summary', you might want to read Help:Edit summary

Thanks again, `-- Chzz ► 00:35, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Samurai Cerberus (talk) 00:39, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with the page Sasuke Uchiha on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 21:30, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He's not? Samurai Cerberus (talk) 21:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Azula, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --haha169 (talk) 15:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But she is a Lesbian.

Help Me Question

please help me I cannot find anything to the effect of "fictional characters by religion" unless there has never been a religious fictional character in the history of mankind. I think there should be a list like that somewhere on this website. And if there is can somebody please send a link? Smurai Cerberus 12:51, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That list does not exist and sources would be hard to find to support it. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 12:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That sucks Smurai Cerberus 12:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dora the Explorer, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 23:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was my bro. Sorry Smurai Cerberus (>")> 23:40, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Todd. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 94.192.72.3 (talk) 16:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the said he was a Pedophilia (or however it's said) in one episode. Smurai Cerberus (>")> 17:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Sims 3. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Consensus with the talk page is to keep it - you have reverted it three times. Once more, and you will be reported. (GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 18:27, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK sorry Smurai Chaos Wolf ☃ 19:26, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Broken warning message in deviantART article

Why did you revert my reversion of Animelover1010101's edit to DeviantArt? The warning comment now doesn't make sense (Please refrain from creating DeviantArt accounts!?), and Animelover1010101 appears to be simply a trouble-making newbie. I don't want to start an edit war. --Imroy (talk) 22:38, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why the revert on Naturism ?

The article on Naturism has a segment that states "Nudism is often practiced in a person's home or garden, either personally or with members of the family". So I added a photo of a person nude sunbathing on a patio deck (home or garden) where that statement is located in the article, and you reverted it almost immediately. Why? NightFlyer (talk) 14:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I said so

August 2009

Your recent edit to the page Super Smash Bros. (series) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. -sesuPRIME 06:21, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]