User talk:SamuelReyes007

I've removed your edist from the 9/11 article since they were essentially off-topic preaching. The article talk pages are for discussing how to improve the articles, not for broadcasting of personal opinions. JoshuaZ 05:49, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SamuelReyes007 I want to apologize for the abusive tone this administrator took with you here. Technically the talk page is for discussing ways of improving the article, but its clear to me the frustration and compassion you expressed in your comment arose from the stonewalling in this discussion. Nearly everyone there is talking about what they think is true or false or just stupid, rather than ways of improving the article. Clearly you should not have been singled out: especially sine the other editors have much more experience (some are administrators) and they repeatedly disregard the purpose of the talk page.

I would like to invite you back. The dissenting editors there represent a significant majority compared to the NPOV violating editors camping out on this article. They apparently have much more time to devote to reverting the article than the rest of us editors so no one else can make a contribution or fix the Wikipedia violations. We could use your contributions to the article and its associated discussion. --Cplot 03:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]